What was wrong with that decision? You ruled that Defarge's vote was not invalid even though it was clear-cut that he did not meet the requirments of posts needed. That is why I support this bill if changed, some justices proved incapable of sitting on the court.
"Proved incapable of sitting on the court"? Isn't this just another way of saying you disagree with the justice? If you disagree with a decision, you just kick the justice off the Cout?
This is precisely why we need lifetime appointments - to prevent the Court being subject to political influence. The indepencence and impartiality of the judiciary cannot survive this onslaught.
The decision was not one that could be dissented from, it was clear-cut law. Gabu admitted the mistake and Defarge even apoligized, and still you voted to let True Dem have the vote.