Haha, I say that and ComRes release a poll showing the parties tied...
Exactly. Over-confidence, lack of media presence and an "uncool" leader is a massive problem for Labour. They haven't had all 3 of them since 1994.
Last month's Scottish election needs to be a massive, unmissable, unavoidable warning to them.
I agree and disagree.
Over-confidence: you could argue the opposite, with people itching to rid Labour of Ed Miliband even though he's improved their standing by at least double figures; and Kinnock's loss in '92 still holds a huge cloud over the party. It seems like if they're not reaching Blair-like leads (leads which will be impossible if Labour want to be on the left), something's wrong.
Lack of media presence: here I agree and disagree - firstly, given the press' inclinations, the less they mention Labour the better, but it does look bad when Miliband's nowhere to be found opposing some hard-to-stomach issues.
Uncool leader: John Smith was sailing away in the polls, despite his uncoolness pre-'94.
Scottish elections: I agree that they need to be a wake-up call; but not in the 'Ian Gray's a poor leader, we need to get rid of Ed' way, but in the sense Labour gave Scots very little reason to vote for them, whereas SNP did. Going back to the ComRes poll, the lower Labour figure seemingly comes primarily from a cross-break of Scots voting SNP rather than Labour.
I think the Scottish lesson is that when there's another social-democratic option there, Labour's lacklustre efforts make them easy evacuates. Of course, a better leader is helpful, but policies that actually inspire people to go out and vote for them is the best vote winner (Attlee etc) and I don't think the other Miliband is anywhere near Ed in willingness to visit that.