MO-SUSA: McCaskill leads Graves by 4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 06:18:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-SUSA: McCaskill leads Graves by 4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-SUSA: McCaskill leads Graves by 4  (Read 1311 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: January 27, 2011, 08:00:11 PM »

I'd say McCaskill has somewhat lower odds of winning than some might think.

Higher than Carnahan, though.

Actually, going in, Carnahan's odds were much better.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2011, 02:48:43 PM »

No one here is counting McCaskil out. On the contrary, we are pushing back against those who are "counting her in".
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2011, 07:41:27 PM »

Graves getting 21% of the black vote? Good luck with that.....

Remember, the cross tabs are tiny so they have a high margin of error.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2011, 07:54:46 PM »

Graves getting 21% of the black vote? Good luck with that.....

Remember, the cross tabs are tiny so they have a high margin of error.

I realize that (and wondered how long it would take someone to say it---2 minutes 10 seconds, congratulations Yank. Tongue), but the final poll results are still based on 21% of MO's 10% African-American vote going Republican. With Obama at the top of the ballot no less (and narrowly carrying MO Grin). I have no doubt the numbers are off with small cross tab sample sizes, but my point is that makes these numbers look a bit better for McCaskill.

Not as much as you might think. And the overall sample is large enough to be reasonably accurate to the extent that is possible this far out.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.