Liberals Ready to Abandon Abortion as an Issue (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 04:55:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Liberals Ready to Abandon Abortion as an Issue (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Liberals Ready to Abandon Abortion as an Issue  (Read 6444 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,867
United Kingdom


« on: July 04, 2005, 04:30:14 AM »

What you have to remember is that any decision like this is made out of some pretty cold electoral calculation. If the Democrats drop abortion as an issue they obvious reckon that there's more votes to be gained (sorry, regained) out of it than votes that'd be lost due to it.
Political geography plays a role too; a vote in (say) Southeast Ohio is worth more than a vote in (say) suburban New York.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,867
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2005, 04:53:39 AM »

It gets quite quirky because virtually every poll shows that between 55-60% believe abortion should be always or mostly legal,

There's a big, big differance between "always legal" and "mostly legal"

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Insofar as Roe v Wade is understood by the bulk of the population to mean that "abortion isn't illegal" then that's certainly true and that if it were to be overturned then all abortions would be illegal, then that's almost certainly true.

Mind you, letting Roe v Wade get overturned could produce a backlash against the court, the Republican party etc. something that would be benificial to the Democratic party.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

By and large I guess that'd be true... although there'd be less ticket splitting Republicans. Mind you that's lopping at most 1 to 2 points of the Democratic Presidential vote in New York, something that isn't worth losing sleep over.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

But I think most of the country would rather that the issue cooled off or died away. This is the problem when Judges legislate from the Bench... if an abortion law had been passed by Congress making it legal for (lets say) 25 weeks or something like that, it wouldn't be such a bile filled issue.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,867
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2005, 02:19:09 AM »

From a political point of view, the Democrats should hope that Roe v. Wade is overturned.  Doing so would return the issue to the State legilslatures and would give them an issue with which to win them more than they would lose.  In patricular the Dems would likely gain complete control of the State Houses in Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota,  Nevada, New York, Oregon,  and could pick the lower House in Indiana.  The only States where it would be likely to hurt Democratic control or partial control are Montana and North Carolina.

There may be reasons for the Dems to filibuster Bush's nominee, but a narrow litmus test on this issue is not one of them.

Exactly. Nowt like a carefully engineered backlash is there?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,867
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2005, 02:25:50 AM »


Perhaps

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Nope. Those two are all about turnout. Perhaps the Democrats would lose some of their edge. Perhaps.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You're funny

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Roll Eyes

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No... it's about 20%. Most people support restrictions of some kind. Most people would like this issue to go away.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wrong

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So someone that thinks Roe v Wade should be overturned is a "bigot"?
Wow. What leaps of logic where required to produce that seemingly insane statement, Archer?

Is being called a "bigot" by a social darwinist a compliment, btw?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,867
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2005, 02:29:59 AM »

Legal in All cases 20%, Legal in Most Caes 36%, illegal in most cases 27%, always illegal 14%  Legal in all or most cases 56%, illegal in most or all cases 41%

You can spin that as a 56/41 split if you like... but there's a huge difference between "mostly legal" and "always legal" int there?
You can also spin that as a 77/20 split (restrictions or no restrictions).
Statistics are fun, no?

Alternatively instead of trying to polarise people for no good reason you can have a 20/63/14 split
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,867
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2005, 03:45:17 PM »

Their is a much bigger difference between mostly legal and mostly illegal.

Legally perhaps. Morally... no. Not really. See... that's the problem with the abortion debate; been mentioned by several posters before that there's really *two* debates going on.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Bottom line is that the overwhelming majority of Americans are moderate on the abortion issue
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,867
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2005, 02:13:10 AM »

STOP WITH THE REDSTATEBLUESTATE CRAP OR I WILL KILL YOU ALL

Thank you
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 10 queries.