Opinion of Union of Concerned Scientists (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 04:52:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Union of Concerned Scientists (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
FF
 
#2
HP
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Opinion of Union of Concerned Scientists  (Read 1456 times)
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,331


« on: August 15, 2015, 01:55:34 PM »

I'm happy that there's so many so enlighten techno-utopians here, who think that the consumers are not able to handle specific food labels. There's clearly a significant potion of the population who don't want GMOs, but those people's choice doesn't matter, the important part are the March Toward The Future under benevolent wisdom of Monsanto, a company who always put people first.

Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,331


« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2015, 03:21:43 PM »

I'm happy that there's so many so enlighten techno-utopians here, who think that the consumers are not able to handle specific food labels. There's clearly a significant potion of the population who don't want GMOs, but those people's choice doesn't matter, the important part are the March Toward The Future under benevolent wisdom of Monsanto, a company who always put people first.

Not being anti-GMO =/= having a favorable opinion of Monsanto.

Denying the consumers GMO labeling=serving Monsanto

I personal don't have a problem with GMO, it serve useful a purpose especially in field like medicine, but also production of a whole lot of products, ioncluding in fish aquaculture (where bigger and faster growing strains have been created). But here's the problem GMO crops have almost always one purpose, to increase their resistance to pesticides (which effect both the environment and consumer negative), so more of it can be used. Of course now someone will bring up GMO salt resistant rice or something else. The problem with that, is while those crops are usual brought up as example of the wonders of GMO, they're not out there, because there's few money in producing them for big companies, there's little economic benefit for the commercial producer of such a crop.

But let's keep pretending that the hostility toward GMO labeling is not a astroturf movement created through successful manipulation by big companies.

Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,331


« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2015, 04:07:09 PM »

I'm happy that there's so many so enlighten techno-utopians here, who think that the consumers are not able to handle specific food labels. There's clearly a significant potion of the population who don't want GMOs, but those people's choice doesn't matter, the important part are the March Toward The Future under benevolent wisdom of Monsanto, a company who always put people first.



>implying that the Socialists on this forum trust Monsanto at all

yeah I don't think you get the whole socialism thing. I support GM crops and defend them against obvious snake oil salesmen on the so-called left, but that doesn't mean I trust/support Monsanto. The point is that GM crops rest on solid scientific evidence. As a socialist, I want the power represented by GM crops to be utilized in the public interest, i.e. by transforming the entire system of food production so that feeding people, rather than the pursuit of profit, is the end goal. You're arguing with a strawman in this thread, especially as the two vocal pro-GM people in it (myself and PJ) are leftists.

Okay I hate to tell you this; there's a difference between the capitalist real world we live in and your imaginative world, where the workers own the means of production and GMO are created by state run institutions, whose purpose are not to turn a profit and serve public interests. In this real world we live in right now, when you have GMO crops in your food, you can be sure that these crops have been created with one purpose, to increase their pesticide resistance, which allow a greater use of pesticide, which are not good news for the environment or the consumers.

Of course if we lived in a world where large state run institutions produced new strains of drought and salt resistant crops, which the farmers could use, your argument would be meaningful and correct. We could wish we lived in such a world, because like state setting up infrastructure, controlling natural monopolies and having a monopoly on the use of force, it would make a lot of sense. But we don't live in that world, so consumer awareness are more important, than delusional dreaming by people who have been misled by Big Business propaganda. Something I don't find very socialist.

Of course I'm not just a poor and ignorant proletarian and not a wise revolutionary vanguard as yourself, so what do I know.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.