CNN: Kasich, Hickenlooper consider unity presidential ticket in 2020 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 08:37:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  CNN: Kasich, Hickenlooper consider unity presidential ticket in 2020 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CNN: Kasich, Hickenlooper consider unity presidential ticket in 2020  (Read 2217 times)
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,976
United States


WWW
« on: August 26, 2017, 09:15:22 AM »

Johnny should either primary the God Emperor or become a Democrat.

Something like this, yes.

I cannot see how labor unions would stomach Kasich as a Democrat, however.  Kasich had a TV show on FOX News.  He's been anti-union from the beginning of his career.  If Democrats actually welcome Kasich into their party "as is", it would be a sign that they've abandoned the labor movement as a constituency that matters.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,976
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2017, 06:43:27 PM »

If Kasich really wants to be President, a challenge to Trump in the primary is his only way, period.

I cannot see what Kasich and Hickenlooper have in common, other than an alternative to Trump.  They're not real "Independent" or "Third Party" candidates; they'd be a (R) and (D) coalition slate.  Why would a voter support them on that basis?  That's a real question, and the answer is far from clear.

It CAN'T be that Trump is THAT bad.  If he's THAT bad, that would demand that the GOP unify and support Kasich.  But the Republicans, who claimed that Trump was THAT bad had the opportunity to get behind Gary Johnson and William Weld, two (2) Republican Governors, and they didn't.  Surely Johnson was better than Trump, the crazy man, was he not?  Oh, I'm sorry, that's not the conclusion most Republicans came to.

Trump's behavior is either (A) really not that bad, or (B) something the entire GOP is in supercalifragilisticexpialidocious denial about.  Do they really believe that Trump's sideshow isn't really that's harmful, nothing but a tut-tutting point?  Or do they really view him as harmful, but are "managing their addiction" because he's their Signer-In-Chief?  If Trump were the threat to the Republic that the #NeverTrump crew say he is, why didn't the GOP bolt in larger numbers? 

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.