I don't understand why he had to say anything about this at all. It may be true that they are not "equivalent", but what does that matter? It's not like you decline to prosecute someone of one murder because someone else has murdered twenty people.
Biden's best hope at triangulation in this conflict is expressing general support for Israel but opposition to the Netanyahu regime, and this completely undermines that.
And just in general, I would like to see the US be much more active and compliant in ICC efforts to combat human rights abuses.
Biden's best hope at triangulation in this conflict is expressing general support for Israel but opposition to the Netanyahu regime, and this completely undermines that.
And just in general, I would like to see the US be much more active and compliant in ICC efforts to combat human rights abuses.
I presume the strategy is that it's further leverage to be applied on Bibi: Washington will shelter him and his officials from prosecution if he plays ball on not continuing to be a flaming moron by treating the PA like dirt.
There ate two interesting parts of the indictment. A) Gantz is not indicted presumably because the ICC, like the rest of the international order, want Likud and its allies to be the sin sponges and Gantz to be untainted. B) Haniyeh is indicted despite the fact he probably can't be linked with October unless they have a crazy smoking gun.