Opinion of the (1820) Missouri Compromise?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 12:29:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of the (1820) Missouri Compromise?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_Compromise
#1
Freedom Compromise
 
#2
Horrible Compromise
 
#3
I am a principleless loser
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Opinion of the (1820) Missouri Compromise?  (Read 577 times)
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 15, 2015, 09:21:41 AM »

Horrible Compromise.  To the great irony of it's authors it probably made the American Civil War more of an inevitability than it was before.  As well it only seemed to encourage slavery advocates to promote more western expansion with the sole intent of getting more pro-slavery votes in congress, even going to war with Mexico to do it.

I can't say I'm a huge fan of it.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,199
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2015, 09:33:07 AM »

Horrible compromise, obviously.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,235
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2015, 10:56:16 AM »

Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2015, 01:10:46 PM »

Obviously a Horrible Compromise from a modern perspective, but at the time I probably would have supported it to avoid a civil war.

Horrible Compromise.  To the great irony of it's authors it probably made the American Civil War more of an inevitability than it was before. As well it only seemed to encourage slavery advocates to promote more western expansion with the sole intent of getting more pro-slavery votes in congress, even going to war with Mexico to do it.
I'm not sure about that. Keep in mind that the slavery issue only really started to heat up after the MO Compromise was repealed. Frankly, I don't think there was a viable long-term solution to the slavery issue that avoids the Civil War.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,585
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2015, 01:28:24 PM »

It put off the looming civil war long enough for the North to become strong enough to win it.  Ditto for the 1850 Compromise. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.25 seconds with 14 queries.