What states have a significant "environment vs. extraction " polarization? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 11:23:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  What states have a significant "environment vs. extraction " polarization? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What states have a significant "environment vs. extraction " polarization?  (Read 453 times)
King of Kensington
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,040
« on: July 22, 2014, 12:42:30 AM »
Probably in many Western states - Alaska? Montana? Oregon?  Though it doesn't seem to be a factor in coal states like West Virginia (not much on the "environment" side).
Logged
King of Kensington
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,040
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2014, 06:01:15 PM »
Quote from: TDAS04 on July 22, 2014, 11:20:24 AM
Definitely Oregon, with its high concentration of both tree-huggers and loggers. 

Just like British Columbia!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.