Walker's "anti-gay transition" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 08:50:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Walker's "anti-gay transition" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Walker's "anti-gay transition"  (Read 1881 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
United Kingdom


« on: July 03, 2015, 10:05:03 AM »

Why do they call Walker anti-gay? I read this piece, and it looks like they're mad that he's reaching out to evangelical groups. The writer looks anti-Walker.  Is this what passes for news now? These opinion pieces?

for God's sake, he said he wasn't going to intervene with SSM in WI, what more do people want.
They want you to be some vocal queer rights proponent or you are apparently anti-gay

Please, don't use the word queer. Just no.

And yeah It's anti gay to try and ban gay marriage
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2015, 04:10:19 PM »

Republicans should continue to defend the pro-life position because human life is precious and deserves to be protected.

However, on the issue of same-sex marriage, the party has to learn to be inclusive and that these are God's children just as much as heterosexual individuals. Therefore, the government should be out of the issue of marriage and if we insist government should be involved, it should only be at the state level.

How do you handle all of the legal issues around marriage then?  How do you know whether people are married for say, purposes of employment benefits without marriage?  And, isn't that the opposite of the Republican social ideology of being in favor of marriage?  I thought Republicans thought marriage had beneficial social and economic effects.  I guess not?

And, Democrats don't want the Federal government involved in marriage.  The only time that has happened was DOMA and Democrats pushed to have that repealed. 



I do believe that children who are raised in a home with one man and one woman are more likely to succeed 

That's complete and utter bollocks. It's like me saying a home with two white parents does better
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.