Constitutional Amendment to Right to Bear Arms (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 03, 2024, 10:55:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Constitutional Amendment to Right to Bear Arms (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Constitutional Amendment to Right to Bear Arms  (Read 6313 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,089
Ukraine


« on: May 07, 2005, 03:44:15 PM »

Surely this now goes beyond the concept of protecting your family and property?  How exactly does protecting the right to use fireworks and dynamite make the honest citizens safer?
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,089
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2005, 12:01:06 PM »

Each individual has the inherent Right of owning, using, and carrying firearms, or arms of any other description that are capable of killing less than 100 people at one time with one instantaneous initiation of that weapon. Any weapon more effective than that is not permitted to be in the possession of any individual under this constitution.

That's a pretty unpleasant sentence to put in our federal constitution.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,089
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2005, 08:07:59 PM »

Sam, I objected to having the word "killing" in our federal constitution more than anything else.

Anyway, can somebody please tell me what kind of self-defense tactic involves the simultaneous murder of 99 people?  If there is an answer to that, can you also tell me why it needs defining in our constitution?
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,089
Ukraine


« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2005, 05:39:52 PM »

I'm not entirely convinced that giving people the right to own any kind of explosives is a good idea, considering the existence of any hidden terrorist cells resident in Atlasia.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,089
Ukraine


« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2005, 05:47:36 PM »

That's true, but to me this amendment only makes things worse for them.

BTW, I'm thinking more along the lines of a Tim McVeigh style terrorist more than any hidden al-Qaeda cells, as they're a heck of a lot harder to spot as being a terrorist, and a lot more likely to own a personal arsenal without having been asked a lot of questions first.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,089
Ukraine


« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2005, 06:13:32 PM »

My point was mainly that by allowing everybody the right to own mortars and grenades and whatnot, we're also allowing psychos to do the same.  As far as the constitutional amendment goes, fine.  But I would expect some pretty restrictive legislation to go with it, in order to prevent this.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,089
Ukraine


« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2005, 03:24:36 PM »

Unless anybody particularly objects, I plan to post one voting thread for this amendment and the federal marriage amendment too, provided the latter passes.  No use in separate threads cluttering the board.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.