PA: "Democratic hack" institute Quinnipiac has Santorum up by only 6 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 02:13:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  PA: "Democratic hack" institute Quinnipiac has Santorum up by only 6 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA: "Democratic hack" institute Quinnipiac has Santorum up by only 6  (Read 2874 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: April 03, 2012, 09:55:53 AM »

...Santorum never called Quinnipiac a Democratic hack institute, just so you know.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2012, 09:55:54 AM »

Before we talk about Santorum's leads in previous states like Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin, let's recognize that support there was softer. This is obviously going to be one of the states where the people that say they support Rick are very unlikely to change their mind. This is also a reason why the Mitt ad blitz won't be as effective. I saw in one of the polls that over 30% are saying they could change their mind. I doubt that most of those are current Santorum backers.

Also worth pointing out that after two weeks of little coverage or coverage about how the race is "over," Santorum still leads. The talk about a flood of endorsements after Wisconsin is hype. Who else is out there that would be newsworthy? In PA, a Toomey endorsement for Romney would be embarrassing (and a dose of karma for Rick. I'd obviously be disappointed in Toomey but whatever) and might energize Romney forces but that's the only big ticket endorsement. I think he, like Corbett, is staying out until after PA (though Toomey is much more likely to issue an endorsement for Mitt since Corbett and Santorum are connected). The bottom line is that there aren't big national endorsers that remain undeclared.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2012, 02:22:24 PM »

Before we talk about Santorum's leads in previous states like Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin, let's recognize that support there was softer. This is obviously going to be one of the states where the people that say they support Rick are very unlikely to change their mind. This is also a reason why the Mitt ad blitz won't be as effective. I saw in one of the polls that over 30% are saying they could change their mind. I doubt that most of those are current Santorum backers.

Also worth pointing out that after two weeks of little coverage or coverage about how the race is "over," Santorum still leads. The talk about a flood of endorsements after Wisconsin is hype. Who else is out there that would be newsworthy? In PA, a Toomey endorsement for Romney would be embarrassing (and a dose of karma for Rick. I'd obviously be disappointed in Toomey but whatever) and might energize Romney forces but that's the only big ticket endorsement. I think he, like Corbett, is staying out until after PA (though Toomey is much more likely to issue an endorsement for Mitt since Corbett and Santorum are connected). The bottom line is that there aren't big national endorsers that remain undeclared.

Jim DeMint, GWB II, Mitch McConnell (formal endorsment), Scott Walker, John Kasich, Mike Pence, Michelle Bachmann, Dick Cheney, Steve King, Rudy Giuliani, Allen West...

Everyone looks at DeMint's comments this far as an endorsement. Over half of the rest of those endorsements would mean little to nothing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 15 queries.