Obama Vs. Reagan!

[ConnoRhett]

Found a very strange article, comparing the things Obama is doing with Ebola to what Reagan did with AIDS.
(tried to post a link, but they say I have to have at least 20 posts to make it. So maybe later)
Okay, perhaps there would be fewer troubles if Reagan paid more attention to the problem quite at the moment it appeared, but that time no one knew what kind of disaster AIDS would turn into! And Ebola virus exists for almost half a century already, but no one paid attention to it until recently.
Of course there are absolutely no real problems here, and the most important thing our president can do is just to hug an infected person!

[ConnoRhett]

Ebola presents no risk to developed nations whatsoever.

"Ebola's just a wise plot made by the authorities..." or any other conspiracy theory can be partly true! Cause everybody know there were no white man, who died of the ebola virus. It's just the way to kill the black people and decrease the world population!

[ConnoRhett]

This is an article about moral equivalency as it pertains to politics, not public health. Therefore, people are supposed to let Obama off the hook or condemn Reagan, not imagine that diseases don't matter.

It's laughable the number of red avatars who are actually rallying to defense of Reagan by discounting the threat posed by ebola. Dangerously ignorant people who can't even understand the implications of articles written by their own pundits.

You know, everything that comes to us from the media has some political background. It's just about logic!
Everybody seems ignorant to somebody smarter, it's also clear!
Strange thing is that nonetheless Reagan ignored AIDS and caused this country lots of troubles, people still love him, cause he gave them hope and love to their motherland. There were no such thing as the American patriots before (at least it was not that common)