Between Two Majorities | The Cordray Administration (user search)

Cashew
Sr. Member

Posts: 2,572

	Re: Between Two Majorities: 2014-2030 \| The Cordray Administration « on: June 25, 2017, 06:54:28 PM »
	« edited: June 25, 2017, 09:14:14 PM by Radical Republican »

I'm curious, how different do you think your outlook would have been if we had a narrow Clinton victory? Or a weak Clinton landslide, winning Arizona and Georgia?

Logged

Cashew
Sr. Member

Posts: 2,572

Re: Between Two Majorities: 2014-2030 | The Cordray Administration

« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2017, 02:28:37 PM »

Quote from: mvd10 on August 19, 2017, 02:14:14 PM

Quote from: Kingpoleon on August 19, 2017, 01:40:02 PM

This is my rough expectations. I think I have too many swing states, it seems a tad too Democratic-leaning, and I'm not sure about CO, MT, AK, HI, and UT.

That map might be spot on if if shows the trends, but I think the change is too radical. Assuming TD's theory is correct I can see something like this being the map in the late 2030s:

Those are maps for civil unrest, not Democratic dominance.

Logged

Cashew
Sr. Member

Posts: 2,572

Re: Between Two Majorities: 2014-2030 | The Cordray Administration

« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2017, 03:21:44 PM »

Quote from: PoliticalShelter on August 19, 2017, 02:56:22 PM

Quote from: Cashew on August 19, 2017, 02:28:37 PM

Those are maps for civil unrest, not Democratic dominance.

Because those maps don't show that, they both look pretty competitive between the two parties.

It's not truly a realignment if Democrats are disadvantaged in the senate.

Logged

Pages: [1]

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 14, 2024, 06:20:08 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more