Health Care System Options for the United States (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 01:32:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Health Care System Options for the United States (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What kind of system would you most want the Affordable Care Act to evolve into?
#1
Beveridge Model
 
#2
Bismarck Model
 
#3
National Health Insurance Model
 
#4
Other (please elaborate)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 62

Author Topic: Health Care System Options for the United States  (Read 3136 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,618
United States


WWW
« on: April 10, 2014, 07:03:44 PM »

Compliments to Physicians for a National Health Program:

The Beveridge Model

Named after William Beveridge, the daring social reformer who designed Britain’s National Health Service. In this system, health care is provided and financed by the government through tax payments, just like the police force or the public library.

Many, but not all, hospitals and clinics are owned by the government; some doctors are government employees, but there are also private doctors who collect their fees from the government. In Britain, you never get a doctor bill. These systems tend to have low costs per capita, because the government, as the sole payer, controls what doctors can do and what they can charge.

Countries using the Beveridge plan or variations on it include its birthplace Great Britain, Spain, most of Scandinavia and New Zealand. Hong Kong still has its own Beveridge-style health care, because the populace simply refused to give it up when the Chinese took over that former British colony in 1997. Cuba represents the extreme application of the Beveridge approach; it is probably the world’s purest example of total government control.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Bismarck Model

Named for the Prussian Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, who invented the welfare state as part of the unification of Germany in the 19th century. Despite its European heritage, this system of providing health care would look fairly familiar to Americans. It uses an insurance system — the insurers are called “sickness funds” — usually financed jointly by employers and employees through payroll deduction.

Unlike the U.S. insurance industry, though, Bismarck-type health insurance plans have to cover everybody, and they don’t make a profit. Doctors and hospitals tend to be private in Bismarck countries; Japan has more private hospitals than the U.S. Although this is a multi-payer model — Germany has about 240 different funds — tight regulation gives government much of the cost-control clout that the single-payer Beveridge Model provides.

The Bismarck model is found in Germany, of course, and France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Japan, Switzerland, and, to a degree, in Latin America.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The National Health Insurance Model

This system has elements of both Beveridge and Bismarck. It uses private-sector providers, but payment comes from a government-run insurance program that every citizen pays into. Since there’s no need for marketing, no financial motive to deny claims and no profit, these universal insurance programs tend to be cheaper and much simpler administratively than American-style for-profit insurance.

The single payer tends to have considerable market power to negotiate for lower prices; Canada’s system, for example, has negotiated such low prices from pharmaceutical companies that Americans have spurned their own drug stores to buy pills north of the border. National Health Insurance plans also control costs by limiting the medical services they will pay for, or by making patients wait to be treated.

The classic NHI system is found in Canada, but some newly industrialized countries — Taiwan and South Korea, for example — have also adopted the NHI model.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,618
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2014, 07:05:12 PM »

There is also the out-of-pocket model, but that is essentially what we had before the ACA, and I am assuming no one in their right minds really want to go back to that.  Hence, I did not include it as an option.  
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,618
United States


WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2014, 11:03:54 PM »

There is also the out-of-pocket model, but that is essentially what we had before the ACA, and I am assuming no one in their right minds really want to go back to that.  Hence, I did not include it as an option.  

We have libertarians, right-liberals etc. No sense keeping an option off the ballot because you find it disagreeable.


I did not keep that option out just because I found it distasteful.  I kept it out because we need to be realistic.  Like it or not, the Affordable Care Act is here to stay.  It is a fact we will continue to see increased government involvement in the health care industry.  Not less.  The only topic for debate is what form that should take once we set about improving and expanding upon the existing law.  
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.