Is this the Most Important Election since 1980? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 09:37:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Is this the Most Important Election since 1980? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is this the Most Important Election since 1980
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 60

Author Topic: Is this the Most Important Election since 1980?  (Read 7443 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« on: August 12, 2012, 07:45:47 AM »


Wonderful to see the left learning to laugh at Alzheimers. Reagan was infinitely more intelligent than people gave him credit for.

You misinterpret - our reference to his mental incopetence is to excuse his crimes.  If he were perfectly cognizant throughout he's as culpable a criminal as the Bushs, perhaps worse.

Ah yes and what 'crimes' were those?

Lebanon intervention, Iran-Iraq intervention, Iran-Contra, Libya bombing, Grenada invasion, funding groups in Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Mozambique, Angola, and Cambodia, war on drugs, expansion of government and regulation, foreign aid increase, restrictions on 'sin'.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2012, 07:50:08 AM »


Wonderful to see the left learning to laugh at Alzheimers. Reagan was infinitely more intelligent than people gave him credit for.

You misinterpret - our reference to his mental incopetence is to excuse his crimes.  If he were perfectly cognizant throughout he's as culpable a criminal as the Bushs, perhaps worse.

Ah yes and what 'crimes' were those?

Lebanon intervention, Iran-Iraq intervention, Iran-Contra, Libya bombing, Grenada invasion, funding groups in Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Mozambique, Angola, and Cambodia, war on drugs, expansion of government and regulation, foreign aid increase, restrictions on 'sin'.

Lebanon intervention: American troops occupying a foreign nation. Sounds like imperialism to me.
Iran-Iraq intervention: It's generally considered 'bad' to shoot down civilian airliners. And you realize you're arguing for Saddam, right?
Libya: Bombing a foreign country in a preventative strike. Imperialism.
Grenada: Imperialist invasion of a Commonwealth realm to distract from the events three sentences up.
El Salvador: Human rights abuses? Heard of them?
Guatemala: See El Salvador
Panama: Invading another sovereign country. Imperialism.
Honduras: Battalion 316.
Nicaragua: Funding terrorists isn't a good idea.
Afghanistan: Especially not when those terrorists are Osama bin Laden.
Mozambique: RENAMO aren't exactly great people either, and funding the guys whose major supporter is Rhodesia isn't conductive to increasing the US's image in Africa.
Angola: See above, add in 'or apartheid South Africa'.
War on Drugs: Restrictions on personal liberty, incarcerating thousands for no reason.
Foreign aid increase: This increase is from a so-called fiscal conservative.
Restrictions on 'sin': This is doing stuff like excessively taxing alcohol and attempting to ban porn. Not good.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2012, 09:07:05 AM »


Wonderful to see the left learning to laugh at Alzheimers. Reagan was infinitely more intelligent than people gave him credit for.

You misinterpret - our reference to his mental incopetence is to excuse his crimes.  If he were perfectly cognizant throughout he's as culpable a criminal as the Bushs, perhaps worse.

Ah yes and what 'crimes' were those?

Lebanon intervention, Iran-Iraq intervention, Iran-Contra, Libya bombing, Grenada invasion, funding groups in Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Mozambique, Angola, and Cambodia, war on drugs, expansion of government and regulation, foreign aid increase, restrictions on 'sin'.

Lebanon intervention: American troops occupying a foreign nation. Sounds like imperialism to me.
Iran-Iraq intervention: It's generally considered 'bad' to shoot down civilian airliners. And you realize you're arguing for Saddam, right?
Libya: Bombing a foreign country in a preventative strike. Imperialism.
Grenada: Imperialist invasion of a Commonwealth realm to distract from the events three sentences up.
El Salvador: Human rights abuses? Heard of them?
Guatemala: See El Salvador
Panama: Invading another sovereign country. Imperialism.
Honduras: Battalion 316.
Nicaragua: Funding terrorists isn't a good idea.
Afghanistan: Especially not when those terrorists are Osama bin Laden.
Mozambique: RENAMO aren't exactly great people either, and funding the guys whose major supporter is Rhodesia isn't conductive to increasing the US's image in Africa.
Angola: See above, add in 'or apartheid South Africa'.
War on Drugs: Restrictions on personal liberty, incarcerating thousands for no reason.
Foreign aid increase: This increase is from a so-called fiscal conservative.
Restrictions on 'sin': This is doing stuff like excessively taxing alcohol and attempting to ban porn. Not good.

This Imperialism rubbish is starting to annoy me. Has every single foreign war fought by the United States been an act of imperialism?

Anyway, this stuff about increasing the U.S image in Africa, quite frankly, does that mean cosying up to communist dictators?

Calling foreign aid a crime is one of the funniest things I've ever heard in my life.

For the most part, yes. As for increasing US image, it means not bombing them.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 14 queries.