The Senate Race That Couldn't Be Lost (CA '64)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 05:18:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  The Senate Race That Couldn't Be Lost (CA '64)		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Senate Race That Couldn't Be Lost (CA '64)  (Read 605 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 31, 2014, 02:46:29 PM »
Sabato on California 1964. I knew about residency and open housing but not debates or the seating challenge. Sabato doesn't cover the primary, but the GE more than compensates. Downright Coakleyish to lose in a Dem tsunami.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2014, 05:31:05 PM »
After I read it I wanted to see the map Wink
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2014, 06:06:00 PM »

I find it fascinating that Salinger won counties like Lassen and Placer but lost both Los Angeles and Imperial by more than his statewide margin.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.21 seconds with 9 queries.