Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 31,794
Political Matrix E: -1.42, S: -0.52
|
|
« on: October 31, 2016, 11:15:06 PM » |
|
Without the Supreme Court? Not particularly smoothly, but yes. Without the entire federal judiciary? In a word, no.
The fact that this possibility is even being discussed shows that we really need to stop picking Supreme Court Justices based on ideology. I could care less about CU, and am fine with a new VRA, but any existing ideas about picking justices who will institute an absolute ban on regulating abortion, and/or who will essentially abolish the 2nd amendment, and/or who will essentially abolish freedom of religion, and/or allow polygamy, honestly needs to stop. That's nothing more than left-wing judicial activism. At the same time, the right needs to shut up any existing rhetoric about finding a judge who will declare ObamaCare to be unconstitutional, or who will declare transgenderism to be a mental illness, or who will place a blanket ban on any sort of regulation on guns, or who will overturn Obergefell. That's nothing more than right-wing judicial activism. (I do believe it is essential that we get rid of Roe eventually, and do not consider that judicial activism) The correct path forward is through centrist judges who will rule based on the law and not based on a political agenda.
Oddly enough, the existing nominee for Scalia's seat could very well be the sort of person we need.
|