Southern Conservatives are America's Unofficial Third Party (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 07, 2024, 01:46:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Southern Conservatives are America's Unofficial Third Party (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Southern Conservatives are America's Unofficial Third Party  (Read 2517 times)
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,039
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« on: March 28, 2017, 03:09:26 PM »

Southern Conservatives Whites Are America's Unofficial Third Party

Nothing conservative about a bunch of voters who supported the New Deal, a strong social safety net, increased wealth redistribution and public works projects except for their racism, which isn't a "conservative" trait.

Why can't people accept that modern Southern Whites are more conservative than their great grandparents ever were?
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,039
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2017, 04:21:46 PM »

Southern Conservatives Whites Are America's Unofficial Third Party

Nothing conservative about a bunch of voters who supported the New Deal, a strong social safety net, increased wealth redistribution and public works projects except for their racism, which isn't a "conservative" trait.

Why can't people accept that modern Southern Whites are more conservative than their great grandparents ever were?

Except they quickly started to oppose all that sh**t when the republican party very successfully painted it as handouts for brown people

ETA:  I misread you, you're at least partially right, though they still even back then opposed that stuff when black people got it

Exactly.  I'm not saying they were "liberals," meaning some connection to modern liberal Democrats.  I'm just saying they weren't "conservatives," meaning some connection to modern conservative Republicans, either.  Many, unfortunately, were clearly willing to compromise political ideology as long as it advanced the society they wanted.

And before someone brings up that they wanted to CONSERVE traditional institutions such as segregation, I just don't buy that definition for POLITICAL conservatism, at least as an instrument to draw parallels between different political eras.  For example, if Trump goes crazy and starts to threaten our democratic institutions, I will not view the Democrats who fight against this change as "conservatives for their time" or some BS just because they were trying to keep the status quo.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,039
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2017, 09:54:55 AM »

Southern Conservatives Whites Are America's Unofficial Third Party

Nothing conservative about a bunch of voters who supported the New Deal, a strong social safety net, increased wealth redistribution and public works projects except for their racism, which isn't a "conservative" trait.

Why can't people accept that modern Southern Whites are more conservative than their great grandparents ever were?

Except they quickly started to oppose all that sh**t when the republican party very successfully painted it as handouts for brown people

ETA:  I misread you, you're at least partially right, though they still even back then opposed that stuff when black people got it

Exactly.  I'm not saying they were "liberals," meaning some connection to modern liberal Democrats.  I'm just saying they weren't "conservatives," meaning some connection to modern conservative Republicans, either.  Many, unfortunately, were clearly willing to compromise political ideology as long as it advanced the society they wanted.

And before someone brings up that they wanted to CONSERVE traditional institutions such as segregation, I just don't buy that definition for POLITICAL conservatism, at least as an instrument to draw parallels between different political eras.  For example, if Trump goes crazy and starts to threaten our democratic institutions, I will not view the Democrats who fight against this change as "conservatives for their time" or some BS just because they were trying to keep the status quo.

I'd make the point that white southerners have always been culturally/socially conservative for their times. The southern social conservatives of 1860s supported slavery, those of the 1960s opposed slavery but supported segregation, those of the 2010s opposed slavery and segregation but turn a blind eye to modern-day racism against AAs.

Anyway, I agree very strongly with this article. I've always felt that southern whites have made up a distinct political culture and identity independent of their party affiliation. The rare times when both parties were competitive among southern whites, they were all united in "conservative coalitions" like when GOP and Demcratic congressmen from the south opposed the Civil Rights Act, or supported the economically conservative agenda of Reagan (he had a Dem House all 8 years).

While it's very easy to paint the Southern Democrats who defended slavery as "socially conservative," it's pretty damn evident that the Northern Republicans who were fighting for abolition were quite socially conservative by every modern metric we could possibly apply (strictly moralist, in favor of restricted immigration, extremely religious/in favor of legislating morality, etc.), I'd argue CLEARLY more socially conservative than their Northern Democratic rivals, so why then do the Southern Democrats get more associated with conservatism by some here than Northern Republicans of the 1860s?  Because they were "conserving" slavery?  Sorry, but I find that lazy.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,039
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2017, 09:56:27 AM »

I agree with this article. Really though America is still two countries but merged into one violently via the Civil War and slowly in the years that followed. One cannot understand the politics or demography in this situation without understanding the remnants of the Confederacy. The South is very traditional, hesitant to change, and agrarian to this day minus big city areas that bring resentment from people in the same states, i.e., Georgians hating Atlanta, SC people hating the beach bums, etc. (Rural vs. urban, especially rural vs. urban people moving down from NY/NJ/NE)).

Okay, I guess I get the point of your post ... but let's not jump the gun here.  The rural parts of South Carolina are more Democratic than the suburban parts, so it's not like there is this clean rural/urban divide (which, depending on what the definition of "urban" is and which category suburbs and exurbs fit into, is very, very overrated when it comes to our politics, IMO).
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,039
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2017, 11:55:51 AM »

I'm just saying they weren't "conservatives," meaning some connection to modern conservative Republicans, either.  

Without Bush demagoguing to the southern religious bloc in 2000, Gore would've won. That's an example of how the south has shaped modern conservative politics.

And non-simpletons can appreciate that "The South" isn't a static region across decades, and it's perfectly possible for the grandparents and great grandparents of current White Southerners to have been significantly more liberal on economic and class issues, which they clearly were.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.