Opinion of the permabanned posters: Haley/Ryan

[Benjamin Frank 2.0]

liberals like ER

topkek

Glad to see the radicalization chamber continues strong.

He votes for all these bans . Yet many hostile red avies aren’t banned yet .

If he hasn’t voted then we should require equal amount of conservative and liberal moderators . Also you took this out of context as I said “bow down to liberals”

The one thing conservatives support DEI for is themselves.

[satsuma]

Atlas has gone Woke. It's all over for forum bipartisanship!

[Morning in Atlas]

Remember that time I gaslighted him into Googling Tubgirl? That was hilarious.

[certified hummus supporter 🇵🇸🤝🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦]

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

Remember that time I gaslighted him into Googling Tubgirl? That was hilarious.

May is Mental Disturbtion Month.

[MasterJedi]

Bye Felicia

[Morning in Atlas]

To be fair, the most apt description of H/R's Posts would be someone defecating all over themselves.

[jamestroll]

I didn't like him much, but this ban seems dubious.

[AGA]

Although I don't agree with him on everything, FF for standing for his principles. Not sure why he was banned, but it was probably unjust as most bans here are.

[Never Made it to Graceland]

I didn't like him much, but this ban seems dubious.

You probably just didn't see some or all of the rule breaking comments. He was getting modded pretty frequently, I would log on and see that he responded to me an hour or two before and it had already been removed before I had a chance to read it.

[President Johnson]

Neutral I guess. Didn't have much of an issue with him, even though I disagree with his opinions. I wouldn't want to make a judgement whether the ban is fair or not. Usually I tend to trust the mod team on this.

[ProudModerate2]

liberals like ER

topkek
Glad to see the radicalization chamber continues strong.

He votes for all these bans . Yet many hostile red avies aren’t banned yet .

If he hasn’t voted then we should require equal amount of conservative and liberal moderators . Also you took this out of context as I said “bow down to liberals”

Regardless. Your comment about ER is unfair and gross.
He should not be attacked by you, or anyone else, for looking at the situation (any situation) in an open-minded and neutral manner.
Shame on you.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Took long enough

[All Along The Watchtower]

He was permabanned?

[GeorgiaModerate]

He was permabanned?

No, this is all a psyop.

(Yes, he was.)

[SWE]

HP but if he said anything banworthy I must have missed it

[Cokeland Saxton]

Mega HP. He will not be missed

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

HP but if he said anything banworthy I must have missed it

He had a tendency to derail threads, for a recent notable example see how he turned a thread about any attempted votes of confidence against Mike Johnson into an argument about...DC statehood, and while that by itself may not be ban-worthy (and as I've said before I actually consider people who take the bait and keep the arguments going for others who often do this like Fuzzy Bear and SnowLabrador to be worse than they are), the mods did specifically say he was thin ice upon his return after his temp ban for calling for ethnic cleansing in Gaza and he still was making posts kind of alluding to that.

[Liminal Trans Girl]

Although I don't agree with him on everything, FF for standing for his principles. Not sure why he was banned, but it was probably unjust as most bans here are.

From what I recall, he was getting close to the calling for Ethnic Cleansing territory

[John Dule]

Other vatniks will be next. Good riddance to every last one of those bootlickers.

[Sir Mohamed]

HP all things considered, but don't recall a negative interaction with the user in question.

That said, OSR claiming ER backs down (edit) to liberal mods is ... a take.

[Sol]

HP all things considered, but don't recall a negative interaction with the user in question.

That said, OSR claiming ER is a liberal is ... a take.

Classic case of syntactic ambiguity; OSR is saying ER is a conservative who bows down to liberals, not that he is a liberal.

[Sir Mohamed]

HP all things considered, but don't recall a negative interaction with the user in question.

That said, OSR claiming ER is a liberal is ... a take.

Classic case of syntactic ambiguity; OSR is saying ER is a conservative who bows down to liberals, not that he is a liberal.

Was his original post different from the edited one? I was mainly referring to the portion Scott (a well respected poster) quoted. In that case, I take back/correct my statement.

[OSR stands with Israel]

HP all things considered, but don't recall a negative interaction with the user in question.

That said, OSR claiming ER is a liberal is ... a take.

Classic case of syntactic ambiguity; OSR is saying ER is a conservative who bows down to liberals, not that he is a liberal.

Was his original post different from the edited one? I was mainly referring to the portion Scott (a well respected poster) quoted. In that case, I take back/correct my statement.

Yes it was, Scott edited my post to say I was calling ER a liberal which is untrue. My post is more a clear post of absolute frustration of how atlas is moderated these days and how clearly it moderates aggressive conservatives far far more harshly than aggressive liberals or progressives.

Really Atlas Moderation needs to return to the Muon Days

[OSR stands with Israel]

Other vatniks will be next. Good riddance to every last one of those bootlickers.

He was not a Vatnicks. He opposed aid to Israel too despite being very Pro Israel so his position was more that he opposed all foreign aid in general.

He supported the sanctions we had against Russia for example and clearly opposed their goals of regime change. Again people on here had a tendency to take everything he said out of context and did it over and over again .