Senate seats in play in 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 04:20:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Senate seats in play in 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of these seats have a decent chance of being competitive in 2016?
#1
Alaska
 
#2
Arizona
 
#3
Colorado
 
#4
Florida
 
#5
Georgia
 
#6
Illinois
 
#7
Indiana
 
#8
Iowa
 
#9
Kentucky
 
#10
Louisiana
 
#11
Missouri
 
#12
New Hampshire
 
#13
Nevada
 
#14
North Carolina
 
#15
Ohio
 
#16
Oregon
 
#17
Pennsylvania
 
#18
Washington
 
#19
Wisconsin
 
#20
Utah
 
#21
California
 
#22
Arkansas
 
#23
Another Republican-held seat
 
#24
Another Democratic-held seat
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 63

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Senate seats in play in 2016  (Read 5134 times)
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


« on: January 15, 2015, 11:43:34 AM »
« edited: January 15, 2015, 11:45:28 AM by SPC »

Empirical evidence demonstrates that there is little distinction between Tossup and Leans or Likely and Safe, especially this early in the cycle. I am pretty much in agreement with Sabato and Rothenberg, whose ratings are identical after that adjustment. Cook underestimates the likelihood of Democrats winning Florida or Ohio against incumbents untested in reelection. Iowa would ordinarily merit inclusion, but Grassley has repeatedly proven an ability to win landslides in presidential years.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2015, 11:48:20 AM »
« Edited: January 18, 2015, 11:29:39 AM by SPC »

I'd say:

Will be competitive: Illinois, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania

Very likely to be competitive: Colorado (D), Nevada (D), New Hampshire

Probably at least somewhat competitive: Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Arizona (which is my choice for where the predictions are most wrong)

Could be competitive, but could easily fall off the map: Alaska, Missouri, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Iowa

Possibly competitive in very favorable circumstances: Louisiana, Arkansas, Washington (D), Connecticut (D), Oregon (D), Utah, North Dakota, South Dakota

Completely safe: AL, CA, HI, ID, KS, MD, NY, OK, SC, VT

Empirical evidence demonstrates that there is little distinction between Tossup and Leans or Likely and Safe, especially this early in the cycle.

Can you point to an article or paper that makes this claim?

I've looked myself at the Senate races that have been placed in those respective categories in the last few elections. Leans flip just as frequently as Tossups, and upsets happen with Safes just as often as with Likelies. For example, let's look at Sabato's February 2013 ratings:
All 5 tossups and the Leans R went to the GOP, the Leans D split 2-2, and one Likely D flipped.

But that was a Republican wave. Let's see what happens when the pendulum swings the other way:
Tossups split 5-2 D, Leans D went 6-0 D, Leans R went 2-0 D, and one Solid R flipped.

And another Republican wave:
Tossups split 8-4 R, both Leans R stayed R, and 3 Safe D flipped.

And another Democratic wave:
Tossups both went D, as did all three Leans D, Leans R split 3-2 D, and one Likely/Safe R flipped.

One more Democratic wave:
Tossup went 4-0 D, Leans R went 2-1 R, Leans D went 8-0 D, and two Likely/Safe R flipped.

In aggregate, Tossups split 15-15 between the two parties, Leans R split 7-6 for the Republicans, and Leans D split 19-2 for the Democrats. I guess this corroborates suspicions that Sabato is Republican friendly in his assessments.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.