Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 02:15:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which is the most absurd objective proposed by Newt Gingrich?
#1
Putting mirrors in outerspace to light highways
 
#2
Colonizing the moon for resources such as moon rocks
 
#3
Repealing child labor laws so children can spend time in school being janitors rather than learning
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 81

Author Topic: Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular  (Read 40409 times)
Penelope
Scifiguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


« on: December 10, 2011, 01:35:40 PM »

Those programs sound pretty awesome actually.
Logged
Penelope
Scifiguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2012, 08:55:01 PM »

Don't you already have a thread for this crap?

EDIT: OH HEY I WAS RIGHT LOLOLOL
Logged
Penelope
Scifiguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2012, 10:47:02 PM »


When your post count exceeds mine, then you can accuse me of trolling. The question is only common sense. Somebody from Massachusetts winning South Carolina against somebody from Georgia would be like somebody from Mississippi winning Vermont against somebody from Connecticut.

Quantity does not matter. What really matters is quality. The quality of your posts has been somewhat poor.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.