India's Prime Ministers Survivor - Lal Bahadur Shastri is our Survivor ! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 11:58:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  Survivor
  India's Prime Ministers Survivor - Lal Bahadur Shastri is our Survivor ! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: India's Prime Ministers Survivor - Lal Bahadur Shastri is our Survivor !  (Read 31761 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: November 03, 2009, 12:16:15 PM »

Gulzarilal Nanda (who?)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2009, 09:04:18 AM »

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2009, 05:12:09 AM »

Morarji Desai
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2009, 04:42:33 AM »

Crying shame.

Desai
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2009, 05:02:04 PM »

Morarji Desai
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2009, 04:09:14 AM »

Desai dammit!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2009, 04:39:59 AM »

Idiot Brahman who belonged in the BJP but wasn't. Tongue

And unlike Charan Singh, Chandra Shekhar, Deve Gowda and IK Gujral, compromise choices who really didn't ever have a chance (but like VP Singh), he actually had a mandate and might not have been the failure he was if he'd been a better politician.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2009, 06:49:43 AM »

Idiot Brahman who belonged in the BJP but wasn't. Tongue

And unlike Charan Singh, Chandra Shekhar, Deve Gowda and IK Gujral, compromise choices who really didn't ever have a chance (but like VP Singh), he actually had a mandate and might not have been the failure he was if he'd been a better politician.

Haven't most Indian leaders been Brahmins?
But not necessarily idiot ones. Tongue

(And actually, no, not "most" of India's leaders have been Brahmins. Very few of those a-year-or-so interim PMs have been, although Manmohan Singh was the first non-Brahman to last a term. If you count Rajiv. Who came from an intercommunity marriage.)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2009, 07:07:12 AM »

Just for self-amusement, I'm researching everybody's caste now.

2. Gulzarilal Nanda (1964, 1966) - Gujjar
3. Lal Bahadur Shastri (1964-1966) - Kayasth (this took minimal research. Wiki says that Lal Bahadur dropped his original surname because it betrayed his (fairly high but not quite Brahman, just as I guessed when I read that) caste and he was opposed to the caste system. Wiki doesn't mention the original surname, but some other google result did... and that surname, Srivastava, led to the caste on Wiki. Shastri is a honorific.)
5. Morarji Desai (1977-1979) - Brahman
6. Chaudhary Charan Singh (1979-1980) - Jat
8. Vishwanath Pratap Singh (1989-1990) - Rajput
9. Chandra Shekhar (1990-1991) - Thakur (this too took research, found some lengthy German-language obituary that mentions it.)
10. Narasimha Rao (1991-1996) - Brahman
11. Atal Bihari Vajpayee (1996, 1998-2004) - Brahman
12. Deve Gowda (1996-1997) - Vokkaliga
13. Inder Kumar Gujral (1997-1998) - (Hindu) Khatri
14. Manmohan Singh (2004-...) - Sikh (Khatri)

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2009, 02:26:46 PM »

Thakur and Rajput are basically regional terms for the same macro-caste. And yeah, quite high caste. But not Brahmin.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
. Yes. Not sure why the family were called "Thakur", they weren't Thakurs.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Solid, middling ground, regionally dominant farmer castes both. Certainly not "high caste", certainly not "low caste" either though certainly Shudra in any ultra-traditionalist classification (but then the same is really true of almost everybody who claims to be Kshatriya).
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Er, in a sense. And in another sense it's not. A class system with a twist.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
A total FF.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2009, 02:56:10 PM »

It's more complicated than that... though there's a lot of that. Basically if you live outside of your and your caste's homeland, people will judge you by whether you look like a rich man or like a peasant more than what, exactly, they know about your caste. To add another layer of confusion, any touchable (for want of a better word) Shudra caste assembled in sufficient numbers in one area usually becomes perfectly respectable there... but might not be elsewhere where it exists in lower numbers. Especially if their religious customs are somewhat inorthodox from a brahmanic standpoint. This goes for Lingayats for example.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #11 on: November 09, 2009, 03:21:45 PM »

Yeah. But what percentage of the people is that, exactly?

The servant class certainly does not think of itself as one unified servant class...
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2009, 06:23:54 AM »

And as may be guessed from something I said earlier in this thread...

I proudly cast my next vote for VP Singh.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2009, 02:48:48 PM »

They are sort of "sun will rise" type predictions... and I'm not certain that the sun will, indeed, rise.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2009, 04:54:22 PM »

VP SIngh
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2009, 04:29:44 PM »

Narasimha Rao

Corrupt Old Bastard. Rajiv next!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2009, 04:20:32 AM »

Rajiv
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #17 on: November 16, 2009, 12:10:41 PM »

Charan Singh

Why is he still here?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2009, 02:18:25 PM »

Manmohan Singh.

There seems to be a working majority coalition in this survivor at present.

Hopefully it will fall apart for the last round. Cheesy
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #19 on: November 18, 2009, 11:46:03 AM »

He didn't survive Tashkent, but maybe he can survive here.

Off with Nehru. For partition.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #20 on: November 18, 2009, 12:38:37 PM »

I vote to kick off Man-oh-man Sing and keep Jawaharlal Nahroo.
Singh is off already. The choice is between Nehru and Lal Bahadur Shastri.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.