I'd say this election is most comparable to 1960 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 03:02:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  I'd say this election is most comparable to 1960 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: I'd say this election is most comparable to 1960  (Read 1622 times)
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

« on: November 16, 2016, 08:37:04 AM »

1896, except this time WJB won.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2016, 01:53:43 PM »


Are we seriously saying that Hillary Clinton was as conservative as McKinley or that Trump was anywhere near as liberal as WJB?!  Jesus, not everything is an urban/rural divide, haha.

Trump won by bringing labor interests into his coalition, focusing on a divisive policy that favored economic elites (for Trump, global free trade, for WJB, the gold standard).  Trump didn't win because of the urban/rural divide. Trump won by gaining in small, northern urban pockets like the Fox Valley, WI; Saginaw, MI; Dayton, OH; Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA.  Also in industrial suburbs like Warren, MI and Lorain County, OH (Kerry won this Trump county by over 12 points!) .
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.