If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 10:41:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century?
#1
Yes--- Top 3 or 4		  
#2
Yes--- Top 5 or 6		  
#3
Maybe---- but gets bumped off the top of the charts		  
#4
No--- Decent Pres but issues with social and economic policies		  
#5
No--- One of the worst Ever		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 84

Author Topic: If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century?  (Read 4252 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« on: July 17, 2017, 08:58:08 AM »
He'd easily be top two, probably behind FDR. Of course, without Vietnam he'd likely have been President for a decade, and who knows how the additional four years would have pushed him. Regardless, the Great Society is one of the most impactful pieces of legislation ever passed, and to rank LBJ below a doddering idiot like Reagan is a hack move.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.