Santorum says the rich don't have to pay taxes because they are rich (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 12:53:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Santorum says the rich don't have to pay taxes because they are rich (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Santorum says the rich don't have to pay taxes because they are rich  (Read 2513 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,081
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: March 16, 2012, 09:40:28 AM »
« edited: March 16, 2012, 09:42:50 AM by Torie »

This is factually wrong. Overseas corporate investment income, is Subpart F income, taxed in the US. It is only income from foreign subsidiaries running an active business overseas, that can delay paying taxes until the money is repatriated to the US parent. All income earned overseas by individuals is taxed in the US - all of it. And the rich do pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than the non rich. Whether or not it is enough (it probably isn't), is another matter. Mitten's money overseas by the way is in a pension plan, which would not be taxed irrespective of where it is.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,081
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2012, 10:08:59 AM »

And the rich do pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than the non rich.
No. First off, the rich pay only their special 15% rate. And the non-rich have their entire incomes subject to to sales and FICA taxes. How much of his income did Romney pay in sales taxes last year?

The rich still pay more, taking all of that into consideration on average (including the regressive sales tax - which is not a federal tax anyway of course). Sure if some guy just gets dividends, and has no taxable interest or earned income, the federal rate is 15%, bearing in mind that the income was already taxed once at 35% or whatever at the corporate level. FICA is meant to be sort of a pension plan, where what you put in, reflects what you get out, with means tested cross subsidies. To dump the FICA tax would put a particular burden on earned income, as opposed to unearned income, which is not wise in my opinion. If you want to soak the rich some more, get rid of a bunch of deductions on a means tested basis, and raise the rates if you have to.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,081
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2012, 02:39:07 PM »

Moving on to capital gains, the higher the rate, the fewer gains will be recognized, so there is an offsetting factor.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.