This isn't a weird concept to me because I respect the concerns of human beings, even if they're rooted in experiences or theological/philosophical/whatever schemas that I don't understand.
You mean we can't have an absolutist, universal, applicable-in-all-circumstances definition of "free speech"?
It's almost as if you're implying that a concept like "free speech' shouldn't be treated as some abstract legal/constitutional principle that has no regard for actual conditions in society....
EDIT: Just saw your edit. Makes sense.