How could Bush win the 2000 presidential election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 03, 2024, 01:39:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How could Bush win the 2000 presidential election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How could Bush win the 2000 presidential election?  (Read 7873 times)
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
United States


« on: May 07, 2015, 07:15:26 PM »

I think it's quite clear why he won, going by statistics collected in Erika Shaker's book "Great Expectations" comparing American attitudes between 1992 and 2000. The results are...unpleasant. Here's a sampler:

-In 1992, 16% of Americans believed non-whites should not be allowed to immigrate. By 2000, it was 25%

-34% of Americans believed a widely advertised product was probably good in 1992. In 2000, it was 45%.

-In 1992, 66% of Americans discussed local issues with other people. That number was 34% in 2000.

-36% of Americans believed that men should be heads of their household in 1992. In 2000, that number was 49%.

-The number of Americans who believed that violence is a normal part of life rose from 9% in 1992 to 31% in 2000.

-The number who believed that violence is an acceptable way to meet your goals rose from 14% in 1992 to 26% in 2000.

-In 1992, 72% of Americans considered defending the environment a priority. In 2000, 57% did.

-American's time spent watching television increased from 35% to 40% between 1992 and 2000.

-65% of Americans considered materialism a threat to society in 1992. In 2000, that number was 48%.

- In 2000 34% of Americans said they enjoyed showing foreigners that they're smarter and stronger, up from 27% in 1992.

I could go on, but you get the point. Something about the Clinton presidency caused a shift from relatively progressive attitudes toward reactionary conservatism and shallowness. This is why Bush was elected.

Uh, how have I not seen this before? What is this attributed to?

No theories were given in the book, the data was in a chapter on global attitudes.

Harrowing. I can only suspect that (1) Clinton's philandering was still considered unacceptable, and Gore took flak for his association with him; (2) voters were ready for change; and (3) there really were people who opposed increased oversight of racial profiling, supported school vouchers, etc. What always bothered me, still does, is that I am convinced more people in FL left the voting booth thinking they had voted for Gore than had voted for Bush. Buchanan overperformed in Palm Beach Co, FL--and by more than 537 votes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.