MI: Levin Will Run for Another Term (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 06:11:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MI: Levin Will Run for Another Term (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MI: Levin Will Run for Another Term  (Read 2893 times)
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

« on: December 05, 2006, 12:55:09 AM »

Good news. This race can definitively be taken off the list of potentially competitive seats. The only question is whether Levin will crack 60 percent again.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2006, 02:08:52 AM »

Too bad Goldie's not around to tell us the Republicans still have a chance at beating Levin.

They could always try to run Devos again. Smiley

He was almost as bad of a candidate as Mark Kennedy.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2006, 03:20:15 AM »

Too bad Goldie's not around to tell us the Republicans still have a chance at beating Levin.

They could always try to run Devos again. Smiley

He was almost as bad of a candidate as Mark Kennedy.

I think it is so frickin hilarious that Devos spent about $40 million of his own money and still lost.

Well see, all of that money he spent on the campaign helped boost the state's economy, thus winning reelection for Granholm. Smiley
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2006, 11:21:17 AM »

Too bad Goldie's not around to tell us the Republicans still have a chance at beating Levin.

obviously the people in michigan dont mind having an economy that is stuck in the toilet.  why else would they keep re-electing the same awful people?

Your ignorance regarding the reasons behind Michigan's terrible economy is all too common. To make it short for you, the blame lies at the federal level, if anywhere, not witht the local politicians. When your economy is hugely based upon auto-manufacturing, deals like NAFTA and CAFTA which allow companies to pay someone in Mexico 50 cents/hr as opposed to $30/hr in Michigan do a lot of harm.

Agreed on where the blame should largely lie. Yes, unions definitely have their bad points. I don't think anyone is arguing that they are perfect. However, I think a lot of people forget just how truly awful working conditions were in this country before unions came along, and people are also kidding themselves if they think the situation would have improved to any large degree if unions had never existed. They never would have been created in the first place if it wasn't for the brutal situations employees were in. They were created to rein in the excesses of corporate abuse and are still necessary to do that to this day. The economy would be a lot worse overall without them.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.