SENATE BILL: Executive Department Amendment (Sent to the Regions) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 02:19:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Executive Department Amendment (Sent to the Regions) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Executive Department Amendment (Sent to the Regions)  (Read 2829 times)
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« on: March 29, 2014, 09:52:33 PM »

I prefer Secretary of the Treasury, but keep in mind, it's not completely inclusive, as the office is responsible for a mass conglomeration of departments.  Of course, Treasury is far better than "Internal", or "Interior".
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2014, 04:08:51 PM »


Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Clauses presently numbered as five and above in Section 2 of Article VIII shall be renumbered accordingly. [/quote]

Feedback: Friendly
Status: Senators have 24 hours to object.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2014, 07:25:30 AM »

A final vote is now open on the underlying amendment.  Senators please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain.

 
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2014, 07:43:54 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Clauses presently numbered as five and above in Section 2 of Article VIII shall be renumbered accordingly. [/quote]

This amendment was a full text replacement, which is what we're voting on.  Sorry for not posting this originally.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2014, 08:04:02 PM »

NAY

I don't get what we are trying to do here. If the goal is to be able to rename departments, we should just have an amendment saying we can rename the departments.  If it's about some arcane implied powers derived from clause 28, then in that case too I think we need to be more specific and straightforward since very few people are going to be able to understand the supreme court precedents.

This amendment accomplishes the goal of having "an amendment saying we can rename the departments".  Perhaps that's not as simple as desired, but it is functional.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2014, 05:37:37 PM »

This has enough votes to pass.  Senators have 24 hours to change their vote.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2014, 06:56:32 PM »
« Edited: April 20, 2014, 07:05:16 PM by Cincinnatus »

Vote on Final Passage of the Executive Department Amendment:

Aye [8]: Alfred, Goldwater, Talleyrand, Yankee, Tyrion, Lumine, TNF, and bore
Nay (1): shua
Abstain (0):

Didn't Vote (1): DC al Fine

Having eight votes in the affirmative this constitutional amendment is declared passed and is presented to the regions for ratification.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.