Would Obama -> Hillary be the first left -> right succession in the same Party? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 03:49:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would Obama -> Hillary be the first left -> right succession in the same Party? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would Obama -> Hillary be the first left -> right succession in the same Party?  (Read 1087 times)
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« on: May 07, 2014, 04:02:29 PM »

Coolidge-Hoover is another comparison. If you go back even further William Harrison-Tyler or Lincoln-Andrew Johnson.
How was Hoover to the right of Coolidge?

And how was Lincoln to the left of Johnson?  This board seems to operate under the assumption that defending slavery and/or segregation was an inherently "conservative" thing, fine (though I strongly disagree with that).  But Lincoln was fiercely pro-business while Johnson was fiercely anti-elite and fiscally populist.  You can't just say "President X used big government, so he's a liberal or President Y used small government, so he's a conservative."  Unless we're willing to say that the parties have switched ideologies since the Clinton administration (anyone remember "The era of big government is over"??  Or conversely how much Bush 43 expanded federal power and spent like there was no tomorrow??) then it's pretty irresponsible to suggest they have ever switched, which is what you imply by saying Lincoln --> Johnson was a rightward switch.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.