Clarence Thomas mulls retirement (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 11:38:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Clarence Thomas mulls retirement (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clarence Thomas mulls retirement  (Read 2737 times)
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,374
United States


« on: June 19, 2016, 06:28:06 PM »

So now we're going to have a 6-3 D court? Awesome.

How's that awesome? That would be a disaster. The US would never recover from that calamity.

Republicans who whine about "activist judges" and worship Antonin Scalia and the court he served on are hypocrites.
Logged
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,374
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2016, 07:23:19 PM »

So now we're going to have a 6-3 D court? Awesome.

How's that awesome? That would be a disaster. The US would never recover from that calamity.

Republicans who whine about "activist judges" and worship Antonin Scalia and the court he served on are hypocrites.
Scalia wasn't an activist judge. Interpreting the law based out of the Constitution and not based on modern conditions isn't activism, it's simply doing the job.

Antonin Scalia didn't base his rulings on the Constitution, he based them on the GOP platform.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.