Beating "uncommitted" with under 60% of the vote is absolutely terrible and embarassing, especially for an incumbent President.
1) Hardly anyone voted.
2) "Uncommitted" is better than the clowns who ran against Obama in other states.
3) Obama did much better than he did in the 2008 primary.
Uncommitted isn't even a person.
Of course Obama did better - there's a huge difference between "Uncommitted" and a former first lady and Senator who has Southern roots. This primary was basically Kentucky Democrats having the option of giving Obama a "stamp of approval" and saying he deserves reelection. When less than 60% of
Democrats are showing confidence in him, well, you have a problem.