John Kasich warns of the Trump/Cruz "path to darkness"
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 06:08:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  John Kasich warns of the Trump/Cruz "path to darkness"
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: John Kasich warns of the Trump/Cruz "path to darkness"  (Read 265 times)
PeteB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,892
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 12, 2016, 11:14:01 AM »

In what is arguably his strongest attack on both competitors to date, Kasich argued Tuesday that this presidential election offers voters two paths -- one of which "could drive America down into a ditch, not make us great again."

............

"Some who feed off of the fears and anger that is felt by some of us and exploit it feed their own insatiable desire for fame or attention. That could drive America down into a ditch, not make us great again," Kasich warned in a prepared speech from the the Women's National Republican Club in New York.

......

Kasich blasted his opponents for the nasty personal attacks they've engaged in throughout the campaign and defended his decision to run a positive campaign.

"I have stood on a stage and watched with amazement as candidates wallowed in the mud, viciously attacked one another, called each other liars and disparaged each other's character," Kasich said. "Those who continuously push that type of behavior are not worthy of the office they are seeking."

He slammed policy ideas from both of his GOP opponents during the course of the speech.

"We have heard proposals to create a religious test for immigration, to target neighborhoods for surveillance, impose draconian tariffs which would crush trade and destroy American jobs," Kasich said.
.......

He summed up Trump's foreign policy proposals in a single line:

"We have heard proposals to drop out of NATO, abandon Europe to Russia, possibly use nuclear weapons in Europe, end our defense partnerships in Asia, and tell our Middle East allies that they have to go it alone."

Kasich, the former chairman of the House Budget Committee, also mocked Trump's and Cruz's methodology for trimming federal spending.

"We have been offered hollow promises to impose a value-added tax, balance budgets through simple and whimsical cuts in 'fraud, waste and abuse.'"

The VAT has been used to describe Cruz's plan, and Trump's first answer to balancing the budget has generally been to cut waste, fraud and abuse.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-kasich-donald-trump-republican-election-2016-path-to-darkness/
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2016, 11:28:45 AM »

Sadly it won't make a difference. The GOP electorate is much different than I imagined.
Logged
PeteB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,892
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2016, 11:49:50 AM »

Sadly it won't make a difference. The GOP electorate is much different than I imagined.

I hope that it is not too little too late as well.  Nevertheless, I am happy he made that speech.  One of the problems with the GOP primary so far has been that all candidates' ideas (especially on the economy) were treated as equal merit, without enough critical thought.  There never was any serious discussion whether the VAT scheme, proposed by Cruz, could sink the economy or if Trump's illusive attempts to find savings would ultimately result in canning some useful budgetary spending.  Instead, silly arguments about "no experience" being better than experience, stigmatizing a whole religion and of deporting millions of people  were constantly floated around as credible policy choices. 

As a result of this vacuum of serious policy and economic thought, most primary voters are treating this GOP contest as a Beauty Peagant - choosing the candidate who sounds the best or whose morals they identify with most.  The problem is that the voters are implicitly assuming that all the candidates would do an equal job, once in office.  They simply shouldn't assume that and there needs to be critical analysis on the economic impacts of some of the proposed policies!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.21 seconds with 13 queries.