UK General Election - May 7th 2015 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 02:15:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Election - May 7th 2015 (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Author Topic: UK General Election - May 7th 2015  (Read 276893 times)
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #125 on: March 02, 2015, 05:01:45 PM »

Back to the Lib Dems again.

I think one reason why a lot of people aren't expecting a total disaster for them (say well below 20) is to do with Ashcroft's polling, which on the headline figures shows them holding several seats which they might not be expected to in the wipeout scenario.

However, whatever you think of constituency polling, the way the questions are asked in the Ashcroft polls needs to be taken into account.  His polls first ask the "standard" question, "If there was a general election tomorrow, which party would you vote for?".  They then, to the same respondents, ask a second question, "Thinking specifically about your own PARLIAMENTARY constituency at the next General Election and the candidates who are likely to stand FOR ELECTION TO WESTMINSTER there, which party's candidate do you think you will vote for in your own constituency?"  (Capitals as they appear in the tables; I've no idea what this means in a phone poll.)

In many constituencies, the second question gets pretty similar answers to the first, but the Lib Dems tend to do a lot better on it, and those headline figures with them ahead are always based on this second question.  (I don't think a single Ashcroft poll conducted in the last year has put them ahead on the first question.)  Now, perhaps the second question is better, but it strikes me that asking the two questions in this way might be acting as a prompt for people considering a tactical or personal vote to answer that way, and we know that pollsters are supposed to be careful with order of questions.  So I think it's possible (but don't really have any evidence) that the Ashcroft polls might be giving the Lib Dems too much of a boost.

For example, here are the figures from Carshalton & Wallington, polled last October/November:
First question Con 30, LD 25, UKIP 22, Lab 17, Green 4
Second question LD 44, Con 22, UKIP 17, Lab 12, Green 3.
So 19% of the sample appear to have changed from something else to Lib Dem between the two questions.  Is this a boost we can really believe in?
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #126 on: March 04, 2015, 02:03:13 PM »
« Edited: March 04, 2015, 02:13:51 PM by YL »

12 polls.  I presume these are based on the "constituency" question.

Scotland - look away unionists

West Aberdeenshire & Kincardine: SNP 14 ahead (of Con; LDs are 5 further back)
Ross, Skye & Lochaber: SNP 5 ahead (Kennedy's seat)
Dumfriesshire et al: SNP/Con tie
Dumfries & Galloway: SNP 4 ahead (of Con; Lab are 2 further back)
Ayr, Carrick & Cumnock: SNP 11 ahead
Edinburgh SW: SNP 13 ahead (!)
East Renfrewshire: Lab 1 ahead
Kirkcaldy & Cowdenbeath: SNP 6 ahead

Wales

Vale of Glamorgan: Con 6 ahead of Lab

England

Colne Valley: Con 1 ahead of Lab
High Peak: Lab 1 ahead of Con
Norwich North: Lab 1 ahead of Con
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #127 on: March 04, 2015, 03:04:56 PM »

If these results are accurate, where else might the Unionist parties be holding on?

Away from Scotland, here's another article about Sheffield Hallam.  I walked past that house no. 234 in the photo earlier today; it's in a very studenty area.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #128 on: March 05, 2015, 03:17:06 PM »

A gentle reminder to all;

Uniform National Swing is still the best indicator (rather than all that subsample stuff and algorithms) at what is going to happen. It bet all other models in 2010 based on the eve of poll vote shares and does equally as well when you key in the actual votes received. One worth thinking about. All that has to change this year is a separate model for Scotland.

Not true.  Martin Baxter's (Electoral Calculus) Strong Transition model outperformed UNS in 2010.

Anyway, the fact is that we didn't have anything like the amount of constituency polling that we do this time.  If Al's right, and it's basically all junk, we might as well use a model based on national (plus Scotland-specific) movements like UNS or Strong Transition, but if there's actually some useful information in those Ashcroft and Survation polls then models like electionforecast.co.uk which use them might do better.  Eventually, we will find out.

One thing UNS and Strong Transition will not do well is predict UKIP performance in individual seats, but that may not matter very much looking at the overall result.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #129 on: March 05, 2015, 04:19:44 PM »
« Edited: March 05, 2015, 04:36:49 PM by YL »

A gentle reminder to all;

Uniform National Swing is still the best indicator (rather than all that subsample stuff and algorithms) at what is going to happen. It bet all other models in 2010 based on the eve of poll vote shares and does equally as well when you key in the actual votes received. One worth thinking about. All that has to change this year is a separate model for Scotland.

Not true.  Martin Baxter's (Electoral Calculus) Strong Transition model outperformed UNS in 2010.


The total seat error (if you add up the seats too high and too low by party in the prediction) with Baxter was 66. With UNS based simply on a 'poll of polls' on the last day, the error was only 48.

I was going on the actual shares cast (and, admittedly, Baxter's own figures).  Given how far out the polls were, I'm finding it difficult to believe that an election eve poll of polls actually did better on UNS: do you have a source for that?  Certainly Baxter's models gave worse results based on the polling than the actual figures.

Edit: I think I misunderstood which way you were measuring the performance.  But still, when testing them, I think it makes more sense to use the actual vote shares as input to the models than some rather erroneous polls.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is true, but my other point is that in 2010 UNS and its variants were the only game in town, because there was essentially no constituency polling.  The other model I was aware of, 538's, was IIRC essentially also a modified UNS, but the modifications it made didn't work very well.

This time, we do have constituency polling, so the models which use it (whether in a crude way, like May2015, or a more sophisticated one) and those which don't can be compared.  As I said, if Al's right about the constituency polling then not using it will presumably turn out better.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #130 on: March 12, 2015, 04:19:18 PM »

The Lib Dem candidate selected to defend Brent Central following Sarah Teather's retirement (probably a lost cause anyway) has been caught up in some fuss about party funding, and is standing down as Lib Dem candidate, but is apparently going to stand as an independent:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/mar/12/lib-dem-ibrahim-taguri-steps-down-as-candidate-amid-donation-claims

(I'm not sure whether he thinks the idea is that he'd still de facto be the Lib Dem candidate, with the Lib Dems not opposing him, or something.)
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #131 on: March 15, 2015, 04:51:04 AM »
« Edited: March 15, 2015, 05:04:02 AM by YL »

Sunday newspaper polls.  These are all online, including the ComRes (who do both phone and online polling).

YouGov: Con 34 Lab 34 UKIP 14 Lib Dem 7 Green 5 SNP/Plaid 5
ComRes: Lab 35 Con 33 UKIP 16 Lib Dem 7 SNP 4 Green 4
Opinium: Lab 35 Con 33 UKIP 14 Lib Dem 7 Green 7 SNP 3
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #132 on: March 15, 2015, 06:59:24 AM »

I thought I'd go through the Lib Dem defences seat by seat.  Predictions are obviously to be taken with a pinch of salt.  Here's the first instalment, others to follow if and when I get round to them.

West Aberdeenshire & Kincardine - This is a one time Tory seat where the Lib Dems won a by-election (with a different name and slightly different boundaries) in 1991, only to lose it in 1992, and took the seat in 1997.  In principle this should be a three way battle between the Lib Dems, the Tories and the SNP, and in the current atmosphere you'd have to favour the SNP.  An Ashcroft poll showed the SNP well ahead and the Lib Dems third.  The Lib Dems released an internal poll showing them ahead to a local newspaper, but that has to be taken with a pinch of salt.  Likely SNP gain.

Argyll & Bute - This has been Lib Dem since 1987.  In 2010 it was something of a four way marginal, with the Lib Dems winning on only 32% and the SNP only 13% behind in fourth.  Again, in the current atmosphere, I'd expect the SNP to go from fourth to first here.  Likely SNP gain.

Bath - This has been Lib Dem since Chris Patten was defeated in 1992, but has only had one Lib Dem MP, Don Foster, who is standing down.  The current boundaries are tightly drawn around the city, which makes them less favourable for the Tories than pre-2010, and Foster has a big majority.  Given the boundaries, I expect the Lib Dems to hold, but new Lib Dem candidates have not always found it easy.  Likely Lib Dem hold.

Bermondsey & Old Southwark - Simon Hughes's seat, which he's held ever since the infamous 1983 by-election.  This is basically about whether Hughes's personal vote, with perhaps a bit of help from Tory tactical voting, can be enough to hold off Labour.  For what it's worth, Ashcroft showed him just ahead on the "thinking about your constituency" question, but well behind on the normal one.  Local election results were promising for Labour.  I think they might just nick it.  Lean Lab gain.

Berwick upon Tweed - Alan Beith has been MP here since he won it for the old Liberal Party in a 1973 by-election, and is standing down.  It contains a lot more of Northumberland than just the town of Berwick.  His majority wasn't that big in 2010 and I'm sceptical that a new candidate can hold on to this.  Lean Con gain.

Berwickshire, Roxburgh & Selkirk - Another Scottish seat which is a three way battle between the Lib Dems, Tories and the SNP.  This wasn't a great area for "Yes" in the referendum, but given that it's a three way battle the SNP won't need to get that high a percentage to win.  I'm going to guess that they do.  Lean SNP gain.

Birmingham Yardley - A long term Lib Dem stronghold at local level which then went Lib Dem nationally with John Hemming in 2005.  This is not demographically typical of Lib Dem urban seats, and might not swing like the others.  It could go either way, but I'm going to guess that Hemming holds on.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Bradford East - This was a 2010 Lib Dem gain.  Their MP, David Ward, has been somewhat controversial and must have been close to being kicked out of the party over his views on the Middle East.  Labour really ought to take this back, although their recent incompetence in the city gives some room for doubt.  Likely Lab gain.

Brecon & Radnorshire - The Lib Dems took this in a 1985 by-election, lost it in 1992 to the Tories and took it back in 1997.  The current MP, Roger Williams, took over in 2001.  I was in this seat not long ago and someone told me it might well go UKIP, but I'd expect it to be a battle between the Lib Dems and the Tories.  Ashcroft showed the Lib Dems just ahead on the constituency question.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Brent Central - Sarah Teather's seat, held in this form since 2010, the parts which were in Brent East since a 2003 Iraq-affected by-election.  She's standing down, it's a natural Labour area, and the Lib Dems now have further problems (see above).  Near certain Lab gain.

Bristol West - It should be pointed out that this is not very like the seat which was Tory for years until Labour nicked it in 1997, and then went Lib Dem in 2005: in the 2010 boundary changes it lost some posh suburbs and gained some inner city areas east of Bristol city centre.  (IMO it should have been renamed.)  The Tories are now out of contention, and it seems like the sort of area which is likely to see a big swing away from the Lib Dems.  A complication here comes from the Greens, who have done well in local elections and seem to think they can challenge for the seat.  (At one point electionforecast.co.uk agreed with them, but no longer; I have no idea what's been driving its forecasts here, as there have been no constituency polls.)  If they pick up former Lib Dem voters who would otherwise have voted Labour they might save Stephen Williams here.  Various things could happen, but I'm guessing that Labour just do it.  Lean Lab gain.

Burnley - This was a 2010 Lib Dem gain, I think basically because the local Labour party was a mess.  It doesn't come across as a natural Lib Dem area.  Likely Lab gain.

Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross - The Lib Dem tenure here goes back to Robert Maclennan's defection from Labour to the SNP.  The current MP, John Thurso, is a hereditary peer, took over in 2001, and has a decent majority, but the Highland Lib Dems did terribly in the 2011 Scottish election, and I doubt he can withstand the SNP tide.  Likely SNP gain.

Cambridge - This was a 2005 gain from Labour.  It might well go back, but the Lib Dems best chance of holding on is probably that their current MP, Julian Huppert, is quite popular in certain quarters, which are well represented in Cambridge, for being one of the few MPs who seems to understand science.  I think he might be able to hold on based on that, but not comfortably.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Cardiff Central - Another 2005 gain from Labour in an urban, student heavy seat.  I think this one ought to go back to Labour, and there was an Ashcroft poll which pointed that way too, though the closeness of Labour's gain in the 2011 Assembly election gives room for doubt.  Likely Lab gain.

Carshalton & Wallington - This is one of those south-west London seats which the Lib Dems took from the Tories in 1997.  I previously looked at the Ashcroft poll here and the enormous swing to the Lib Dems which Ashcroft's second question gave, which I'm a bit doubtful about.  I'd make them narrow favourites, though.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Ceredigion - A traditional Liberal stronghold which Plaid took in 1992, but the Lib Dems took back in 2005.  The current MP, Mark Williams, had a big swing towards him in 2010, which makes him look fairly safe on paper.  There's a bit of a hippie element mixed in here, and there are two universities, though both are on the small side.  I expect Plaid to come back a bit, but doubt it'll be enough to win.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Cheadle - A south Greater Manchester suburban seat won very narrowly from the Tories in 2001 and then held in a by-election in 2005 after the first Lib Dem MP, Patsy Calton, died.  The Lib Dem majorities have never been big, and in spite of Ashcroft showing them narrowly holding on (again, only on the second question) I think the Tories might nick this back.  Lean Con gain.

Cheltenham - Like Bath, a spa town seat taken from the Tories in 1992, but Cheltenham is less of a university town than Bath and this is not as safe, with the Lib Dem majorities mostly being fairly small.  The Tories are certainly the only threat.  The Lib Dems might hold on, they might not.  Lean Lib Dem hold.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #133 on: March 17, 2015, 03:05:22 PM »

Ashcroft has released some more constituency polls (hi Al).  All of these are in Con/Lab marginals which he'd had polled before.  Margins, together with the month(s) and margin(s) of the previous poll(s), below.

City of Chester: Lab +11 (Oct 2014: Lab +1)
Croydon Central: Lab +4 (Oct 2014: Lab +6)
Halesowen & Rowley Regis: Lab +2 (Oct 2014: Lab +1)
Nuneaton: Lab +5 (Oct 2014: Lab +3)
Southampton Itchen: Lab +8 (May 2014: Lab +8; Aug 2014: tied)
South Swindon: Tied (Dec 2014: tied)
Wirral West: Lab +5 (Oct 2014: Lab +1)
Worcester: Con +6 (Oct 2014: Lab +2)

As well as any general points about the reliability of Ashcroft's constituency polling, it's worth pointing out that these polls are likely to have similar volatility to Ashcroft's national polls, so most of these movements aren't very significant.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #134 on: March 17, 2015, 04:40:22 PM »

A second batch of Lib Dem seat guesses:

Chippenham - A new seat in 2010, which the Lib Dems won.  Ashcroft has polled it twice, both times finding a reasonably comfortable Tory gain.  While this may not be reliable, I'd have to make them favourites in spite of the tendency of first time Lib Dem incumbents to do well.  Lean Con gain.

Colchester - Bob Russell gained this for the Lib Dems from the Tories in 1997, and has held it ever since.  He had a decent majority in 2010, and Ashcroft has shown him holding on reasonably comfortably.  He looks like he's favourite.  Likely Lib Dem hold.

North Cornwall - An old Liberal stronghold, this went Tory in 1979 but Paul Tyler won it back for the Lib Dems in 1992 and passed it on to Dan Rogerson in 2005.  Rogerson has never had a big majority so it looks a bit precarious.  I'd guess that the Liberal history indicates enough strength to just hold on.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

North Devon - Famously once Jeremy Thorpe's seat and lost to the Tories just before his trial in 1979, Nick Harvey (who is, unusually for a Lib Dem, a bit of a Eurosceptic) won it back for the Lib Dems in 1992 and has held it ever since.  As with North Cornwall, it doesn't look that safe but I'm going to guess they can just hold on.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Mid Dorset & North Poole - Annette Brooke has held this seat with its ugly name since 2001, but her majority in 2010 was tiny and she's standing down.  This looks as likely a Tory gain as any Lib Dem held seat anywhere.  Likely Con gain.

East Dunbartonshire - A middle class Greater Glasgow suburban constituency, this was created in its current form in 2005 and has been held since by Jo Swinson for the Lib Dems.  She might just hold on in a three way tie with Labour and the SNP, but to be honest I think she's third favourite.  Given the current situation in Scotland, I'd favour the Nats in spite of the area's high No vote, especially as the three way battle means they don't need that high a share to win.  Lean SNP gain.

Eastbourne - A Sussex coastal resort with a reputation as a retirement destination.  The constituency went Lib Dem in a 1990 by-election just before the downfall of Th*tch*r; the Tories won it back in 1992 but it stayed marginal and the Lib Dems won it again in 2010.  Ashcroft was very promising for the Lib Dems here, and Lib Dem first time incumbents do often do well against the Tories.  Likely Lib Dem hold.

Eastleigh - Lib Dem since a 1994 by-election, and now with three consecutive Lib Dem MPs, I tend to think that if the Lib Dems could hold this in a mid-term by-election in this parliament after their incumbent got sent to jail, they're not likely to lose it now.  They also do very well in other elections in the area.  Likely Lib Dem hold.

Edinburgh West - I have similar feelings about this to East Dunbartonshire, except that the share needed to win could be even lower.  It's been Lib Dem for longer; they gained it from the Tories in 1997.  Lean SNP gain.

North East Fife - Ming Campbell has been MP here, the more genteel end of Fife around St. Andrew's, since taking it from the Tories in 1987.  He's standing down, and in spite of the number of English students around (OK, there's more to the seat than St. Andrew's) I doubt the Lib Dems can resist the SNP.  Likely SNP gain.

Gordon - A long standing Lib Dem seat, held by Malcolm Bruce with various boundaries since 1983.  However, Bruce is standing down, and the SNP selected Alex Salmond.  This is over.  Near certain SNP gain.

Hazel Grove - Like Cheadle, this is a south Greater Manchester suburban constituency.  It has more of a Liberal tradition, though, voting for them in February 1974, and having been Lib Dem since 1997.  Andrew Stunell is standing down, which might give the Tories hope in spite of his comfortable majority.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Hornsey & Wood Green - A fairly middle class North London seat which was once Tory, Labour from 1992 to 2005 and Lib Dem since.  The Lib Dems recently released an internal poll with some dodgy methodology which still showed them behind, which says it all.  Likely Lab gain.

Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch & Strathspey - The eastern part of the Highland region (though there are more easterly parts of the Highlands as generally understood) with most of the population in the city of Inverness.  This seat has history for close election results; its main predecessor in 1992 managed to have the Lib Dems first on 26% and the Tories in fourth on 22.6%.  Danny Alexander will be doing better than I expect if it's remotely close in 2015, though.  Near certain SNP gain.

Kingston & Surbiton - One of those south-west London seats where the Lib Dems have been strong for a bit, Ed Davey won this very narrowly in 1997 and then by a country mile in 2001.  His majority has come down a bit since then, but I think he's still favourite.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Leeds North West - This stretches out from fairly central studenty Headingley to the separate town of Otley.  It was Tory until 1997, then Labour came from third to take it, then it went Lib Dem in 2005.  Greg Mulholland has quite a bit majority, and seems to be reasonably popular, but it does seem to fit the bill for a big swing to Labour.  I'd guess Mulholland just holds on.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Lewes - A Sussex seat based around the town with a penchant for burning effigies of Popes and other public figures on the Fifth of November.  Norman Baker has held it for the Lib Dems since 1997.  He is probably idiosyncratic enough to be able to hold on, and has a reasonable majority.  Likely Lib Dem hold.

Manchester Withington - One of the urban seats the Lib Dems won from Labour in 2005.  They've never had a big majority, and local election results in Manchester tell a persistent tale of woe for the Lib Dems.  Near certain Lab gain.

North Norfolk - This was once a Labour seat, which really just shows how much things have changed in rural East Anglia.  Norman Lamb won it very narrowly for the Lib Dems in 2001, but increased his majority substantially in 2005 and further in 2010, and now looks quite comfortable by Lib Dem standards.  Likely Lib Dem hold. 
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #135 on: March 17, 2015, 04:49:17 PM »

Unionist pact in Northern Ireland: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-31930496

UUP stand down for DUP in Belfast East and Belfast North.
DUP stand down for UUP in Fermanagh & South Tyrone and Newry & Armagh

The DUP seem to have the better of this, reflecting the current state of the parties I suppose. Newry & Armagh is surely hopeless for Unionism, and a unity candidate couldn't quite win FST last time.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #136 on: March 18, 2015, 03:38:49 AM »

More polls:

TNS: Con 33, Lab 32, UKIP 17, LD 7, Green 4, "Other" (inc. SNP) 7
YouGov: Lab 36, Con 34, UKIP 12, LD 7, Green 6, SNP/Plaid 5
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #137 on: March 18, 2015, 01:05:48 PM »

Well, of course it wasn't actually a no change election last time, because of Alliance defeating Peter Robinson in East Belfast.

This time, I expect the DUP to take East Belfast back, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are no other changes.  The UUP must have a chance of beating Sinn Féin in FST, given the pact, but you'd probably have to make SF slight favourites given that a unity Unionist candidate fell just short last time.  Elsewhere, I doubt the DUP can get enough votes from South Belfast's demographic to beat McDonnell, unless SF really eat into his vote, and I suppose the UUP might have some chance of getting a seat back from the DUP; South Antrim is probably the most likely.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #138 on: March 18, 2015, 02:02:20 PM »

Final batch of Lib Dem guesses:

Norwich South - An urban, studenty Lib Dem gain from Labour in 2010, with a large Green presence in local elections.  I suspect the Lib Dems are headed for third here.  Near certain Lab gain.

Orkney & Shetland - This has been with the Lib Dems and, before them, the Liberals, since 1950.  They even did well here in their 2011 Scottish Parliament and 2014 Euro disasters, and it's a strong No area so the SNP seem unlikely to take it.  Near certain Lib Dem hold.

Portsmouth South - The Lib Dem MP here, Mike Hancock, got into all sorts of trouble and is now sitting as an independent and has been effectively deselected.  There's still Lib Dem strength locally, but it's hard to see them holding.  UKIP are sniffing around, which could complicate things.  Likely Con gain.

Redcar - A spectactular Lib Dem gain from Labour in 2010 on an enormous swing.  Their MP, Ian Swales, is standing down.  In spite of some reports of troubles in the local Labour party, I suspect that the 2015 result will be such that if this site still exists in twenty years time people will be wondering if the 2010 result was a misprint.  Near certain Lab gain.

Ross, Skye & Lochaber - Might Charles Kennedy lose to the SNP?  Until recently I'd have said no, but with the SNP surge there's now at least room for doubt.  Kennedy isn't as high profile he was, and reports of his recent Question Time appearance won't be helpful.  For now, I'm going with him to just hold on, but I'm not at all convinced.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

St Austell & Newquay - A Cornish seat, parts of which have been represented by Liberals and Lib Dems since David Penhaligon won Truro in October 1974.  Given the narrow margin in 2010 over the Tories, I think the Tories have to be favourites here, though Cornwall isn't always easy to predict and may have a heavy UKIP influence.  Lean Con gain.

St Ive's - As well as St Ive's, this includes the rest of west Cornwall, including Penzance and the Isle of Scilly.  Andrew George, who is on the left of the party and has a reputation for Cornish nationalist tendencies, has been Lib Dem MP here since 1997.  His majority fell sharply in 2010.  I'm going to go for him to hold on based on a personal vote.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Sheffield Hallam - Three constituency polls have led to speculation that Nick Clegg is in danger of losing his seat to Labour, in spite of his huge 2010 majority, the demographics of the seat and the fact that Labour have never won it.  I don't find the vote shares (low 30s) that the polls give Labour implausible, but where I do find the polling figures odd is that they suggest that Clegg is losing enough votes elsewhere that Labour could win with 30%.  Clegg has a fight on his hands, but I think he's still favourite to hold on at this point.  (NB I live here and will be voting Labour.)  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Solihull - A surprise Lib Dem gain from the Tories in 2005, and a narrow regain in 2010 after boundary changes made it notionally Tory again.  I think the Lib Dems will struggle to hold on here.  Likely Con gain.

Somerton & Frome - This has been won by David Heath for four elections in a row with consistently tiny majorities.  He's now standing down and being replaced by David Rendel, former Lib Dem MP for Newbury.  The small majorities and the retirement suggest the Lib Dems are going to struggle.  Likely Con gain.

Southport - A Lancashire coastal town annexed against the protests of many of its residents to Merseyside in 1974, the constituency has been a Lib Dem/Con marginal for some time, Liberal in 1987, Tory in 1992, and Lib Dem since 1997.  The Tories are in a mess in Sefton borough, and it's quite difficult to see them winning.  I note Andrew Teale's suggestion that UKIP might come through the middle, and can see that the demographics might be good for them by north-west England standards, but I think the Lib Dems must be favourites.  Likely Lib Dem hold.

Sutton & Cheam - Another south-west London seat won in 1997.  The Tories were close enough behind in 2010 that you'd probably expect them to gain, so the question is how seriously to take the Ashcroft poll showing Paul Burstow 18 points ahead of them (on the constituency question; he was behind on the standard one).  I wouldn't take it that seriously, but it might be just enough to make me make him favourite.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Taunton Deane - The Lib Dems won this in 1997, lost it back to the Tories in 2001, and gained it again in 2005, with the new MP being the ridiculously right-wing Jeremy Browne.  He's retiring, and even if he'd stayed on I suspect the seat might well have changed hands again.  Likely Con gain.

Thornbury & Yate - This is just north of Bristol, including the northern edge of Bristol's suburban sprawl (though most of that is in Filton & Sadly Broke).  Steve Webb has been MP for this area since 1997, and looks reasonably comfortable on the 2010 figures.  Likely Lib Dem hold.

Torbay - This was Tory until Adrian Sanders won it by 12 votes in 1997, and they keep thinking they're going to get it back and keep not doing so.  They might have a chance this time, but I'm going to guess that Sanders holds on again.  Lean Lib Dem hold.

Twickenham - Vince Cable has been MP here since he won it from the Tories in 1997.  He isn't everyone's cup of tea, but I think he's retained more popularity than most Lib Dems and I don't think he's likely to lose.  Likely Lib Dem hold.

Wells - A 2010 Lib Dem gain from the Tories after years of trying and coming close.  There have been three constituency polls here which have all shown the Tories ahead.  I doubt it'll be that easy for them, but just about make them favourites.  Lean Con gain.

Westmorland & Lonsdale - This has only been Lib Dem since 2005, but Tim Farron seems amazingly popular in the area and they also do well in other elections, even carrying South Lakeland district in their Euro disaster.  Near certain Lib Dem hold.

Yeovil - Paddy Ashdown's seat, which he won in 1983, has been held by the very right wing David Laws since 2001.  He had a big majority in 2010 and should be favoured to hold on, but I do have some suspicions that his expenses problems which forced him out of the Cabinet might be used against him.  Lean Lib Dem hold.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #139 on: March 18, 2015, 02:14:18 PM »

... and, to summarise:
"Near certain" hold 2
"Likely" hold 9
"Lean" hold 17
"Lean" loss 10
"Likely" loss 13
"Near certain" loss 6

Don't take too seriously.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #140 on: March 20, 2015, 07:39:05 AM »

More polls, all online panel ones.

Yesterday's YouGov: Lab 34 Con 33 UKIP 14 LD 8 Green 6 SNP/Plaid 4
Today's YouGov: Con 35 Lab 33 UKIP 13 LD 8 Green 6 SNP/Plaid 4
Today's Populus: Lab 34 Con 31 UKIP 17 LD 9 Green 5 SNP 5
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #141 on: March 21, 2015, 05:09:31 AM »

I asked this question in the Canadian 2015 elections thread, and I will ask it here: could what happened in Israel happen in the UK? Polls are showing the contest as neck-and-neck, but could the final election result see the Conservatives actually increase their seat totals in Parliament, and strengthen their hold on government, enabling PM David Cameron to stay around at least until the end of the decade?  Does anyone see that happening?

Hopefully not.  But the polls could indeed be wrong, as they were last time (over estimating the Lib Dems), and also it's possible things can change in the campaign.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #142 on: March 26, 2015, 11:06:03 PM »

Can we presume there's been no budget bounce or what?

There clearly was, at least according to this poll:

Conservatives enjoy biggest poll lead since 2010: Party enjoys three point advantage of 36 per cent in the wake of the budget

By JAMES CHAPMAN FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 18:21 EST, 22 March 2015 | UPDATED: 06:24 EST, 23 March 2015


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
----------------------------------------------------

Read more

You need to look at all the polls, not just the one the Daily Mail cherry picked, and I think when you do that there is no evidence that the Budget moved anything.  Even the movement in Opinium could have been margin of error stuff.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #143 on: March 29, 2015, 04:34:59 AM »

And now we enter the world of last minute retirements; there are always a few of these (largely because they entail - for various practical reasons - a suspension of the usual candidate selection methods). It seems that the first is Geoffrey Robinson (Labour, Coventry North West) who has been an MP since a by-election in 1976.

Or is it? It is now being suggested that maybe he isn't going to retire.

LabourList says he's standing again.  There is much less excuse for late retirements now that the date of the election has been known for so long.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


« Reply #144 on: March 29, 2015, 04:43:55 AM »

Labour 4 points ahead with YouGov, Tories ahead 1 with Opinium. With YouGov, Miliband was seen as having come across the best in the interviews by a margin of 49-34 and his personal ratings have increased to a still rather poor -28 (up from -40something) and his 'better Prime Minister' rating is up to 23% while Cameron's is down to 35%.

It should be pointed out that YouGov's sample of those who watched the interviews seems to have been heavily Labour; those who saw it were Lab 47 Con 28, those who saw clips were Lab 40 Con 28, but those who didn't see it were Con 36 Lab 30.  The questions about the interviews were only asked to those who saw it or saw clips.

However, I note that YouGov also asked their whole sample, as well as the best PM question, "Which party leader do you think is the most honest and trustworthy?", "Which party leader do you think is most in touch with ordinary people's concerns?", and "Which party leader do you think is the most genuine and authenic?", and Miliband led Cameron on all three.  (Cameron was third on the second one, behind Farage as well as Miliband.)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 8 queries.