Neil Gorsuch Confirmation Process Discussion (confirmed 54-45) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 11:34:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Neil Gorsuch Confirmation Process Discussion (confirmed 54-45) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Neil Gorsuch Confirmation Process Discussion (confirmed 54-45)  (Read 56652 times)
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« on: March 27, 2017, 04:15:45 PM »

Good, the filibuster needs to be repealed anyway.

It most certainly does. It is a disaster, all of it. The problem is that it tends to cause the parties to have no accountability. If a party has a majority (the trifecta) and is cohesive, let it pass its agenda, and be held accountable. If the agenda which becomes law sucks, the party will be thrown out, and their junk repealed. No instead, we have the situation, where once in a blue moon, a party has the trifecta, and the 60 votes, and can unilaterally pass Obamacare, and then the darn thing cannot be repealed or revised when the other party gets in, without 60 votes, and the only way to deal with it, is play the reconciliation game, and have a flawed cf bill (requiring also that it be passed in three increments, with no guarantee all three will be passed to boot), so the darn line is the kissing cousin to a freaking Constitutional Amendment.

Not good. It's totally toxic to a healthy robust democratic process. Kill it!

Amen!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.