Reince Priebus vs. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

[100% pro-life no matter what]

Discuss with maps.

I'd have to imagine that Priebus would be more liked, but Wasserman-Schultz would have the name recognition advantage at first.

[Free Bird]

Debbie the tyrant can't help her obsession with attacking Republicans, and as such, makes her entire campaign about attacking Priebus. Her failure to lay out actual policy and constant attacking eventually becoming numb leads to a decisive Priebus victory.

[Bigby]

Free Bird has it right. Priebus may be kind of just there, but he'd win based on adopting the strategy DWS claims the Dems are best at: "We suck less." He won't even have to actually use it as DWS would hand him the election.

[Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Debbie the tyrant can't help her obsession with attacking Republicans, and as such, makes her entire campaign about attacking Priebus. Her failure to lay out actual policy and constant attacking eventually becoming numb leads to a decisive Priebus victory.

Wasserman-Schultz is a woman. She won't lose NH.

If NH is so much in love with Women, then Clinton wouldn't be trailing in the primary polls.

[Kingpoleon]

President-Elect Priebus campaigned on enslaving the New Hampshire population to fix the mess Schultz leaves behind.

[Coolface Sock #42069]

If NH is so much in love with Women, then Clinton wouldn't be trailing in the primary polls.

Nor would half the state have ousted Carol Shea-Porter for Frank Guinta last year.

Wasserman Schultz would run well in New England (she's their kind of candidate if I've ever seen one) but would fall on her face pretty much everywhere else. Priebus would win handily.

The Democratic establishment would never let DWS get near the nomination for that reason. You'd see a relatively moderate Dem senator or governor quickly enter the race and overtake DWS. Maybe someone like Michael Bennet or Jack Markell.