2014 exit polls? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 05:05:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2014 exit polls? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2014 exit polls?  (Read 1564 times)
Attorney General & Senator Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« on: November 04, 2014, 12:16:16 AM »

Unfortunately, no exit polls for Massachusetts, Arizona, Hawaii, or Connecticut. But every other Senate/Gubernatorial race that I don't have rated as Safe or Strong Lean (Likely) is thankfully included.
Logged
Attorney General & Senator Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2014, 12:42:54 AM »

No Massachusetts or Connecticut exit polls? Ugh. And yet they are doing Mississippi. Perfect.

Arizona, New Mexico, and Maryland would have been interesting too. You'd figure the least we could get is exit polling in every state if election spending is reaching $4-6 billion every two years.
And every state gets the generic ballot/Obama Approval etc. questions, so why not just ask about the horseraces as well? But whatever.
Logged
Attorney General & Senator Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2014, 11:53:25 AM »

Looks good (a lot better than 2012, when they completely ignored all red states). I'll be looking forward to Florida and Texas, that's for sure.

Better to ignore red states than to ignore states with competitive races...

Yeah, except demographically important states like Georgia, Texas, and South Carolina were ignored. Not to mention most noncompetitive blue states were polled (MA, IL, CT, VT, NY, NJ, IL, CA, and WA were all polled despite non-competitiveness.
MA had a competitive senate race....


I wouldn't mind seeing a New Jersey one either. They definitely left out a few weird ones.
Why? The only thing interesting there is the third district.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.