Recent Posts

Show posts from buddies only

I, for one, welcome our new official white nationalist compound state.

Holy sh**t they were right
I remember like what less than a hour ago reading a comment on like a post about the greator idaho and they said literally word to word "How long before this is declared a "White supremacist movement"?"
How are you guy this easy to predict.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Territorial_Imperative

I already know that exist and i can safely say the greater idaho movement isn't that.
Like seriously, how do you think that a movement for some counties of a state to join a another because they don't like the leftists policy is the same as a white supremacist project to leave the nation and kill all minorities there, Like seriously explain to me i want to see why.

An unspoken but quite Express portion of these radicals goals is to succeed from state governments which they feel are all too cozy and controlled by those people from urban areas.

Quit defending the indefensible, take the l, and walk it back

Out of currently relevant politicians, I think that Phil Scott could be the only one that might fit that category, although I'm not sure what his stance on Israel is. But even then he isn't a perfect example as he could be anti-death penalty (or at least he hasn't pushed for Vermont to bring it back). And I'm not sure if he had anything to do with Vermont's decision to give minority residents priority over the Covid vaccine.

Alfonse D'Amato comes to mind. He primaried a much more liberal Republican and 2 of his 3 victories were very close.

Surely Javits was a better fit, but D'Amato wasn't that bad, specially for a NY republican in the 1980s.

Kinda weird how Tim is having a freakout over people who are now, quite literally, a pile of bones. Like dude, they ain't gonna come out of the grave to thank you for "heroically" defending pieces of bronze that just happen to look like them over a century later.

A likely explanation for the delayed return was that the due date fell a month after the Soviet Union’s invasion of Finland in November 1939, Strand noted. “The return of the book might not have been the first thing on the borrower’s mind when the due date approached.”

Pathetic excuse.

I guess I am the super-minority here. My priority is:

1, tough on crime.

2, eradicate identity politics: eradicate any differential (including preferential) treatments based on race, sex, gender identity, etc.

These make me a firm R leaner. Yet the current partisan debates seem focusing on abortion, Israel, and Trump, which I firmly side with D.

Regarding Israel, although I agree terrorists like Hamas must be eradicated, I don't think the way Israel is treating Palestinians is achieving this goal. Such inhumane treatment will just encourage more radical terrorists, even if they can conquer Gaza. I don't want a penny of my tax sent to aid Israel. I want every penny of foreign military aid sent to Ukraine instead.

There might be a small population who voted for Trump over Covid, but returned to the Dems as that's no longer politically relevant. Likely the more socially libertarian type.

I'm looking forward to seeing what additional questions or requests the jury has tomorrow, after they hear this testimony and the instructions in the morning, and if maybe we will get a verdict.

Appalachian from NC that didn't like tariff nor 'big federal goverment' (states rights, you know...) Voted for Adlai in 1952 thanks to Sparkman. Then, he voted for Eisenhower as he didn't trust Kafenauer. He voted for Kennedy as he saw Lodge as an elitist WASP pro-black Yankee. Then, he vlted for Goldwater agaisnt the CRA. He didn't trust Carter in 1976 for his flip-flops and his Playboy interview, but later grow ln him. He voted for Mondale as he throught Reagan would create a big crisis out of debt. He finally voted for Bush after watching  Revolving Door.

They really wouldn’t need to do anything. Woo strong candidates that could conceivably win tough Senate races (Laura Kelly, Rob Sand, Mary Peltola), but the House would easily flip (or stay) Dem, and NC and ME should be relatively easy Dem gains. Dems probably expand theie governorships by a couple too.

Not really sure why Laura Kelly is seen as red-hot potential Senate material. She'll be closer to 80 than 70 years old by that time and it isn't like she won reelection decisively unlike her predecessor Sebelius; she barely beat Schmidt by 2 points. Even under the best circumstances I can't see her ending the nearly century-long lockout of Dems from Kansas' U.S. Senate seats.

Peltola is probably the most viable of those 3 options by a country mile; even I as a bit of a doomer could see that happening in a Trump midterm.

Laura Kelly won reelection in 2022 amidst an indcredibly unpopular president from her own party against a candidate who was seen as the strongest challenger to her. All I’ll say is this: underestimate her at your own peril—she very well could break the dry spell, especially in a Trump midterm. Context matters. Kansas is getting bluer.