What will Obama do after he loses the election?

[5280]

He'll open up a new church in Chicago or go back to community organization.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

He could invent a new brand of teleprompter.

What's this weird obsession with teleprompters? Candidates have used written notes for pretty much everything ever since politicians have been literate. Is it disdain for the fact that Obama likes technology?

[RogueBeaver]

If he loses, he'll write his memoirs, globetrot and reenter Democratic politics after a few years.

[Lincoln Republican]

trollercoaster of a thread.

But the thread entitled

What will Romney do after he loses the election?

isn't?

[Stranger in a strange land]

Become Secretary General of the United Nations.

UN SGs are never from great powers, an American SG would be unacceptable to China, Russia and most of the Moslem world.

That's true, but remember we are talking about the guy who was given the Nobel Peace Prize for not being George W. Bush, so...

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

trollercoaster of a thread.

But the thread entitled

What will Romney do after he loses the election?

isn't?

That one's fairly trollish too. It's really just the 'after' rather than 'if' or even 'assuming' that sinks it.

[pbrower2a]

trollercoaster of a thread.

But the thread entitled

What will Romney do after he loses the election?

isn't?

Because Mitt Romney has a 97% chance of losing.

President Obama is more likely at this stage to have a fatal heart attack than lose his re-election bid.

[ajb]

He could invent a new brand of teleprompter.

What's this weird obsession with teleprompters? Candidates have used written notes for pretty much everything ever since politicians have been literate. Is it disdain for the fact that Obama likes technology?

Ronald Reagan used the teleprompter regularly.

[HagridOfTheDeep]

trollercoaster of a thread.

But the thread entitled

What will Romney do after he loses the election?

isn't?

Because Mitt Romney has a 97% chance of losing.

President Obama is more likely at this stage to have a fatal heart attack than lose his re-election bid.

L-M-A-O

[5280]

trollercoaster of a thread.

But the thread entitled

What will Romney do after he loses the election?

isn't?

Because Mitt Romney has a 97% chance of losing.

President Obama is more likely at this stage to have a fatal heart attack than lose his re-election bid.

That's the biggest pile of horse manure I've heard on this thread.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

trollercoaster of a thread.

But the thread entitled

What will Romney do after he loses the election?

isn't?

Because Mitt Romney has a 97% chance of losing.

President Obama is more likely at this stage to have a fatal heart attack than lose his re-election bid.

That's the biggest pile of horse manure I've heard on this thread.

Agreed.  While Obama might have a heart attack, there is no way the chance of him having one in the next seven months is 4% or higher.  Indeed, given their relative ages, the chances Romney dying from a sudden medical event are likely higher than Obama's.

[Indy Texas]

If he loses, it will be by a relatively narrow margin. He will replace Bill Clinton as the de facto spiritual leader of his party, give lectures at universities and at corporate retreats for high-tech and renewable energy firms, write a couple of books. Michelle will get her own talk show and license her name for a casual-chic women's clothing line to be sold at Target.

In 2016, Obama angers some on the left of his party by backing centrist Colorado governor John Hickenlooper for the Democratic nomination (Hickenlooper narrowly loses to Romney in the fall).

In 2020, Obama announces he wants his old job back; he faces minor opposition from Arkansas Governor Bill Halter, who is running as a more liberal-populist candidate. However, Obama prevails by margins similar to when Al Gore defeated Bill Bradley. In the fall, Obama faces South Dakota Congresswoman Kristi Noem and wins, becoming the second president in American history to be elected to non-consecutive terms.