Voters of Liechtenstein reject initiative for more democracy
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 10:09:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Voters of Liechtenstein reject initiative for more democracy
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Voters of Liechtenstein reject initiative for more democracy  (Read 2726 times)
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 01, 2012, 07:12:37 AM »

Results

Background information in English

Roughly 75% of the people of Liechtenstein voted no on an initiative which sought to cut the powers of their head of state, Prince Hans-Adam II. The initiative "Damit deine Stimme zählt", which would have made it impossible for the Prince to veto popular initiatives, was soundly defeated. Thus, Prince Hans-Adam II retains his power to veto both parliamentary and popular decisions.

Ironically, even if the voters had approved of this initiative, it would not necessarily have translated into more democratic rights for the people - Prince Hans-Adam II could simply have vetoed the decision.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2012, 07:15:46 AM »

Happy to live in a republic.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2012, 07:30:17 AM »


The opponents of the initiative seem to have managed to turn this initiative into a fundamental debate on Liechtenstein's monarchy. The monarchy, the most important identity marker of Liechtenstein, is extremely popular, and any political group which tries to attack the royal family or calls for the abolishment of the monarchy remains a fringe movement. Additionally, the fact that the Prince threatened to make use of his veto rights in the past probably discouraged supporters of the initiative - why vote if the head of state vetoes the initiative anyway?
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,323
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2012, 10:22:43 AM »

Results

Background information in English

Roughly 75% of the people of Liechtenstein voted no on an initiative which sought to cut the powers of their head of state, Prince Hans-Adam II. The initiative "Damit deine Stimme zählt", which would have made it impossible for the Prince to veto popular initiatives, was soundly defeated. Thus, Prince Hans-Adam II retains his power to veto both parliamentary and popular decisions.

Ironically, even if the voters had approved of this initiative, it would not necessarily have translated into more democratic rights for the people - Prince Hans-Adam II could simply have vetoed the decision.

Does the Prince actually veto anything?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2012, 11:41:56 AM »

Announcing their opposition is usually quite enough that they don't have to.

Does Freedom House still rate the place 1/1?
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2012, 11:44:47 AM »

Announcing their opposition is usually quite enough that they don't have to.

Does Freedom House still rate the place 1/1?

Yep. 1/1.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2012, 01:01:58 PM »

What an awful people.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2012, 01:19:16 PM »

Well done Liechtenstein.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,907


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2012, 01:22:21 PM »

Results

Background information in English

Roughly 75% of the people of Liechtenstein voted no on an initiative which sought to cut the powers of their head of state, Prince Hans-Adam II. The initiative "Damit deine Stimme zählt", which would have made it impossible for the Prince to veto popular initiatives, was soundly defeated. Thus, Prince Hans-Adam II retains his power to veto both parliamentary and popular decisions.

Ironically, even if the voters had approved of this initiative, it would not necessarily have translated into more democratic rights for the people - Prince Hans-Adam II could simply have vetoed the decision.

Does the Prince actually veto anything?

Apparently he threatened to veto any move to legalize abortion. I also think I read somewhere that he threatened to abdicate if this initiative was passed.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2012, 01:46:14 PM »

...and that threat is really "and take my banking empire with me; and while I can't run it the way I run it anywhere else, the poor mountain valley it's based in, and which is profitting quite handsomely from it, will probably go back to starving". It's not as if the family has any sort of biographical (genetic, say) ties to the place - until a century ago they never even visited.

Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,323
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2012, 01:53:58 PM »

...and that threat is really "and take my banking empire with me; and while I can't run it the way I run it anywhere else, the poor mountain valley it's based in, and which is profitting quite handsomely from it, will probably go back to starving". It's not as if the family has any sort of biographical (genetic, say) ties to the place - until a century ago they never even visited.



Neither does the current Swedish monarchy for their country - the first guy in their dynasty was a French soldier elected when the old line died out.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2012, 04:40:59 PM »

I don't see anything wrong with this; if the majority is okay with a strong constitutional monarchy, then they can stick with that.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2012, 06:29:50 PM »

Does Liechtenstein have any purpose in existing? Just let Austria or Switzerland have it.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2012, 06:32:42 PM »

Does Liechtenstein have any purpose in existing? Just let Austria or Switzerland have it.
They clearly have a separate national identity. So yes.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2012, 10:43:14 PM »

Does Liechtenstein have any purpose in existing? Just let Austria or Switzerland have it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_haven#Examples

There you have it. The entire purpose of Liechtenstein for existing.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2012, 11:05:38 PM »

I think it's time to do something about their weapons of mass destruction.
Logged
Peeperkorn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,987
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 0.65, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 02, 2012, 03:02:42 AM »



Ironically, even if the voters had approved of this initiative, it would not necessarily have translated into more democratic rights for the people - Prince Hans-Adam II could simply have vetoed the decision.

Hilarious.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 02, 2012, 04:14:45 AM »

Results

Background information in English

Roughly 75% of the people of Liechtenstein voted no on an initiative which sought to cut the powers of their head of state, Prince Hans-Adam II. The initiative "Damit deine Stimme zählt", which would have made it impossible for the Prince to veto popular initiatives, was soundly defeated. Thus, Prince Hans-Adam II retains his power to veto both parliamentary and popular decisions.

Ironically, even if the voters had approved of this initiative, it would not necessarily have translated into more democratic rights for the people - Prince Hans-Adam II could simply have vetoed the decision.

Does the Prince actually veto anything?

I am not sure whether the Prince has ever used his veto, but he threatened to veto an initiative which attempted to legalize abortion not too long ago. As a result, turnout was very low and the initiative failed narrowly.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 02, 2012, 05:43:40 AM »

...and that threat is really "and take my banking empire with me; and while I can't run it the way I run it anywhere else, the poor mountain valley it's based in, and which is profitting quite handsomely from it, will probably go back to starving". It's not as if the family has any sort of biographical (genetic, say) ties to the place - until a century ago they never even visited.



Neither does the current Swedish monarchy for their country - the first guy in their dynasty was a French soldier elected when the old line died out.
The Swedish monarchy does not make Sweden's laws.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.244 seconds with 12 queries.