The Book of John is one of the most popular books of the New Testament among Christians. It is, of course, the newest gospel about Jesus, and it's also the one that makes the most suspect claims about Jesus' mysticism and is heavily depended on by commonly held doctrines, such as those of the Trinity and Incarnation, as evidence of their authenticity. It also gives us "Doubting" Thomas the Apostle and numerous other characters, some of which whose existence has been disputed. (
This article breaks it down nicely. Yes, yes, it's a Spong piece, but I think he provides valuable insight nonetheless.)
John is obviously not the only book of the New Testament to attribute divine features to Jesus, yet it devotes more of itself to describing those features than any other gospel or epistle. So to that I ask, how would Christianity have turned out if it were not for John's gospel? Would there be any less emphasis on Jesus' miracles within modern evangelical circles absent that book?