I should also add that that interview indicates one of two things:
1) Medina is likely on the stupid side of things and doesn't know what she's talking about
2) She's a crazy truther
I'd vote #1, especially considering how vehement of a denial her campaign issued of the trutherism charges in its press releases following the interview. If she was smart, and a passionate believer in 9/11 conspiracy theories, she'd have either not said what she believes or said what she believes and stuck by it. The fact that her campaign commented about how she was unprepared for the question but that she firmly believes the government had nothing to do with 9/11 makes me think that that is closest to the truth. While on air, she might have been trying to think about what her nutcase supporters believe or something instead of her own beliefs or whatevsky, I'm really not sure. The woman is clearly retarded, still struggling to find her public presence and not sure what she is doing along the way.
I hate interviews that have me on the same side as Glenn Beck.
Seriously, though, I understand where you were coming from earlier, but listen to her! How can you equivocate and fence-sit on 9/11? EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY remembers 9/11, clear as day. I don't care how stupid you are, it's hard to believe anyone could be stupid enough to not know that saying what she said on the air is a sure-fire career killer.
