Will Hillary win because of Faithless Electors?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 11:40:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Will Hillary win because of Faithless Electors?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will Hillary win because of Faithless Electors?  (Read 877 times)
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 10, 2016, 10:31:25 AM »

Well? She might.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2016, 10:32:50 AM »

Hopefully.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2016, 10:35:58 AM »

Trump is projected to get 303 electors. No way this is happening. Maybe if he was in 270s (unlikely IMHO, but somewhat possible).
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2016, 10:45:37 AM »

If Clinton had won MI and PA, then it would be, what?  Trump 270 Clinton 268?  In that case, especially with Clinton winning the popular vote, there'd be plenty of speculation about faithless electors throwing it to the House.  But as it is, while we might still see a few faithless electors, it won't be enough.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,886
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2016, 11:03:03 AM »

No lol
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2016, 11:07:36 AM »

Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2016, 11:09:06 AM »

What could possibly go wrong in this scenario?
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,795


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2016, 11:09:59 AM »

No way are we getting 30+ faithless electors at once.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2016, 11:46:33 AM »

No and she shouldn't be. It would set an extremely dangerous precedent, and possibly worse to our country than anything Trump could do as President.
Logged
Kung Fu Kenny
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,394
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2016, 11:47:34 AM »

Half of the states have laws against faithless electors and Trump would sue the hell out of anyone who tried to pull that
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2016, 12:32:51 PM »

Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2016, 12:36:30 PM »

She might try. But she knows, what's gonna happen to her if she fails Evil
Logged
Andrew
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2016, 07:07:09 PM »

If there were enough never-Trump electors to vote for someone else, they would still be Republicans and not voting for Clinton.  They could vote for another Republican and send it to the House, but even then the winner would be Trump or this other Republican.

So while Trump could conceivably lose to someone else, it won't be Clinton.
Logged
rafta_rafta
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 926


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2016, 07:09:45 PM »

No, and she shouldn't either. This is the system and adhering to it is extremely important for democracy even when we don't like the results
Logged
Andrew
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 10, 2016, 07:14:20 PM »

Electors who vote for someone other than who carried their state are adhering to the system.  That's why we have electors and not just points on a scoreboard.

Now whether we should have this system is another question.  Here's a simple diagram I have used to explain the electoral college:

DDD     RR  -------->  D wins!

DDD     R     R  ---->  R wins!
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,781


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 10, 2016, 07:19:25 PM »

Not even 0.0001% chance.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 10, 2016, 07:31:01 PM »

"The second amendment folks would take care of that"
Logged
Lexii, harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy
Alex
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,151
Argentina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 10, 2016, 08:33:16 PM »

LEL


u funny
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 10, 2016, 08:38:07 PM »

Dems, Hillaryites, give it up.

This election is over.

Get over it.

Hillary has lost.

She is fitting into peaceful retirement at her home in Chappaqua.

Leave her alone.

Let it be.

There will be no faithless electors.

Forget this fantasy, because that's what it is, a fantasy.

Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 10, 2016, 11:28:46 PM »

Trump is projected to get 303 electors. No way this is happening. Maybe if he was in 270s (unlikely IMHO, but somewhat possible).

Trump will finish with 306.
Logged
Bigby
Mod_Libertarian_GOPer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,164
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: 3.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 10, 2016, 11:30:59 PM »

Aren't two WA electors promising to not vote for Hillary despite her winning WA? It could easily go either way.
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,538
Vatican City State


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 11, 2016, 01:27:43 AM »

Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 11, 2016, 01:29:16 AM »

And I might go on Tinder right now and pick up a supermodel. Not going to happen.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,283
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 11, 2016, 02:10:47 AM »

No, and she shouldn't. The electoral college is an abomination, but it's the system we have right now. It's not going to help the left to hope that the presidency is taken from Trump at the last minute. Let Trump be president; they've won this battle. Now the Republican Party is stuck with Trump, and the people who voted for him are accountable for everything he's done. The right has to live with this, and that's going to benefit those of us on the left soon enough.
Logged
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,756
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 11, 2016, 02:18:39 AM »

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 13 queries.