Opebo has already stated his opinion on this case in this thread so his neutrality would be questionable.
That makes no sense, KIL. How can one give an opinion if one is neutral? If we as judges are expected to both give opinions and be neutral, I think you can see this is a legal conundrum.
I must object to the exclusion of justices based upon guesses as to what their opinions might be,
even by members of this Court. I further note that the defendant has been pressured into forgoing his right to trial by jury due to this exclusion, and thus this practice must be invalidated upon appeal.