MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 07:07:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25 (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25  (Read 236184 times)
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


« Reply #50 on: May 25, 2017, 10:42:37 PM »

Please be reminded that special elections do not mean much for 2018.

But the swing can tell us a lot, if you average them.
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


« Reply #51 on: May 25, 2017, 10:45:11 PM »

Please be reminded that special elections do not mean much for 2018.

But the swing can tell us a lot, if you average them.

yea, but it's one thing to swing and come close, and another thing to outright win shocking races like ma 2010.

That's true enough. Well, did we have an idea in the averages in 2009 - 2010 specials? MA was definitely a good harbinger of 2010 with the GOP victory.
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


« Reply #52 on: May 25, 2017, 10:46:30 PM »

Ultimately the big takeaway from Montana, does it really challenge the emerging narrative about 2018? I feel it reinforced it.

The way I see it is, if the Republican significantly under-performs compared to past races, then it could still mean bad things for the GOP next year. The win/lose margin is really what is important here, not whether or not Quist were to barely eek a win out.

As 538 said, special elections alone don't really give a good forecast of the midterms, but taken as a group they do an alright job of that. So far, as a group, it looks like the GOP is under-performing a lot in places they shouldn't.

That's my point, yes. The emerging narrative right now looks like a strong D 2018.
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


« Reply #53 on: May 25, 2017, 11:05:13 PM »

Ultimately the big takeaway from Montana, does it really challenge the emerging narrative about 2018? I feel it reinforced it.

The way I see it is, if the Republican significantly under-performs compared to past races, then it could still mean bad things for the GOP next year. The win/lose margin is really what is important here, not whether or not Quist were to barely eek a win out.

As 538 said, special elections alone don't really give a good forecast of the midterms, but taken as a group they do an alright job of that. So far, as a group, it looks like the GOP is under-performing a lot in places they shouldn't.

That's my point, yes. The emerging narrative right now looks like a strong D 2018.

But is it strong enough to take back the House? Hmmm

My gut says no, thanks to polarization.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.