How would you vote on each of Reagan's two tax cuts (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 12:13:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  How would you vote on each of Reagan's two tax cuts (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you vote on his tax cuts
#1
Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981(Yes)
 
#2
Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981(No)
 
#3
Tax Reform Act of 1986(Yes)
 
#4
Tax Reform Act of 1986(No)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 67

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: How would you vote on each of Reagan's two tax cuts  (Read 1850 times)
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

« on: January 29, 2017, 10:02:55 PM »

Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2017, 02:29:42 AM »

Why do so many people vote no on 1986? It was a revenue neutral tax reform plan that passed with broad bipartisan support.


But I would easily vote yes on both.

Cause the far left believes that all tax cuts are bad and the only good changes to tax laws is if you increase taxes.

That would be correct, especially if it's for the rich.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2017, 03:59:08 AM »
« Edited: January 30, 2017, 04:00:48 AM by Intell »

Why do so many people vote no on 1986? It was a revenue neutral tax reform plan that passed with broad bipartisan support.


But I would easily vote yes on both.

Cause the far left believes that all tax cuts are bad and the only good changes to tax laws is if you increase taxes.

That would be correct, especially if it's for the rich.

Reagan cut taxes on upper middle class people too massively just not the rich , so do you think engineers, accountants who make between 90 k - 110k should have their taxes go up as well  

That would be correct. Also 90-110 k, at that time, would be on the high ends of the upper-middle class, probably top 15% in terms of income.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2017, 08:46:59 PM »

Intell why do you think Engineers , Accountants , and Doctors should have their taxes raised.

You're making ia distinction between these jobs, not the fact, that these people should pay higher taxation, for an expanded welfare state, and social equity, because of their upper-middle class background, and higher incomes.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2017, 07:32:26 AM »

Intell why do you think Engineers , Accountants , and Doctors should have their taxes raised.

You're making ia distinction between these jobs, not the fact, that these people should pay higher taxation, for an expanded welfare state, and social equity, because of their upper-middle class background, and higher incomes.


Heck no to raising taxes on upper middle class people . If you want to spend more money on welfare cut other spending don't raise our taxes

Your taxes should get raised, and I do not care for the tears of greed of upper-middle class people in trying to prevent such increases.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.