The Constitution Party (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 01:30:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  The Constitution Party (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Constitution Party  (Read 12920 times)
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« on: September 13, 2004, 08:35:42 AM »

I actually like them. i think they are less radical them John Edwards.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2004, 03:03:03 AM »

I wouldn't say they're too radical. They have some good ideas, but I can't say I like their God in government approach.

Still, I'm wondering how many people are thinking that the Libertarians aren't quite so scary now. Wink

Libertarians scare me more...btw.  Smiley

Considering you think that alcohol and cigarettes should be illegal, that doesn't surprise me. (I was talking more to the liberal crowd anyways Smiley)

Of course, I would prefer to mind my own business. It's not my business what someone else puts in their body - if they want to something stupid like that, I say let them suffer the worst fate imagineable - the consequences of their own actions.

And if desiring liberty is scary, then I like being scary. Wink

You took that out of context in the other thread, and that doesn't surprise me.  I think they should be illegal in public areas because of reasons that 2nd hand smoke is disgusting, and the results of a drunk are just down right scary.  You claim to desire liberty in call cases, well what about my liberty to breathe fresh air when I go to a football game?  Or just walk downtown?  When liberties of a few crush the liberties of the many, there's a problem.

Well, on the football game, the owners of the stadium can decide to prohibit somking there.
As for downtown, it's public. There there is an open for controversie.(Although I think the solution would be privatizing the srettes:P hehe jk.)
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2004, 03:08:03 PM »

Well, on the football game, the owners of the stadium can decide to prohibit somking there.
As for downtown, it's public. There there is an open for controversie.(Although I think the solution would be privatizing the srettes:P hehe jk.)

Not if the football Stadium is a Public 4-year university.

well, I think it should be privatized in the first place. Take that, statist! Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.