Risk-taking men 'not attractive' (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 08:36:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Risk-taking men 'not attractive' (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Risk-taking men 'not attractive'  (Read 2303 times)
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« on: November 12, 2009, 12:57:21 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Who knew women preferred men who had concave utility functions?
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2009, 01:36:11 PM »


Die in a fire idiotic troll.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2009, 05:55:49 PM »
« Edited: November 12, 2009, 08:51:39 PM by phknrocket1k »


Behavioral/Micro topic.

For a better read up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expected_utility_hypothesis
and a useful paper.
http://econ.ucsd.edu/~mmachina/papers/Machina_Science_Article.pdf

Didn't I mention concave utility (which imply risk aversion) functions in the initial post?
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2009, 07:04:11 PM »
« Edited: November 12, 2009, 08:44:01 PM by phknrocket1k »


Yeah, I would have thought the opposite to be true considering how society glorifies machoism, but it makes sense from an evolutionary perspective assuming utility of risk could be determined perhaps by genetic and/or psychological factors and heritable.

Women might themselves find greater preference for men on the lower end of the risk-return spectrum and a lower taste for variance.

Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2009, 08:26:20 PM »


Yeah, I would have thought the opposite to be true considering how society glorifies machoism, but it makes sense from an evolutionary perspective assuming utility of risk could be determined perhaps by genetic and/or psychological factors.

Women might themselves find greater preference for men on the lower end of the risk-return spectrum and a lower taste for variance.



http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1278236
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.