MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 07:53:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25 (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25  (Read 236413 times)
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #25 on: April 27, 2017, 09:43:23 PM »

Look - Democrats don't have to care about electing Rob Quist to the House. They should be energized to oppose god damn Greg Gianforte, of carpet bagging, sales tax instituting, creation museum creating, public land selling fame. He's a genuine HP who deserves to be beat and beat badly.

All they need to do is cut an ad about how Gianforte doesn't think you should be able to retire. Quist would win by more than 10 points.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #26 on: April 28, 2017, 10:38:46 AM »
« Edited: April 28, 2017, 10:40:21 AM by Alpha »

"We don't wanna give him money because it'll nationalize the race" is such a cop out.

WHICH IS SOMETHING REPUBLICANS DO ANYWAYS. They've already cut attack ads that portray Quist as a pawn of Pelosi.

It's because it doesn't fit their narrative. They want to win in GA-6 with Ossoff because it'll show that their "trade a blue collar vote for a white suburban vote" strategy was actually right all along, and having a populist win wouldn't contribute anything to that.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #27 on: April 28, 2017, 11:45:21 AM »

"We don't wanna give him money because it'll nationalize the race" is such a cop out.

WHICH IS SOMETHING REPUBLICANS DO ANYWAYS. They've already cut attack ads that portray Quist as a pawn of Pelosi.

It's because it doesn't fit their narrative. They want to win in GA-6 with Ossoff because it'll show that their "trade a blue collar vote for a white suburban vote" strategy was actually right all along, and having a populist win wouldn't contribute anything to that.

Do you even read this forum? cinyc's link shows that the DCCC dumped a six-figure sum into the MT Democratic Party.

That's only a small fraction of what the Montana Democratic party laundered for the Hillary Victory Fund. Sad!
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #28 on: April 29, 2017, 06:33:23 PM »

Rob Quist Turned Down A Visit From DNC Chair Tom Perez

Not surprising, but this doesn't sound to me like Perez isn't trying everything to get Quist elected.

It's so great to see Perez get constantly shat on.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #29 on: April 30, 2017, 03:44:57 PM »

And here is the first and last "official" debate between the three candidates

I actually watched the entire thing for some reason. Not that these debates really matter, but I thought it was a very underwhelming performance by Quist (he dodged a lot questions and kept repeating his usual "But Russia" and "But millionayhs" talking points, etc.). Remember when he sounded like a dove?

Say what you want about Gianforte, but he sounded pretty authentic for the most past, especially at the end.

Quist certainly isn't living up to the hype he has been getting here.  I no longer think this will be close.  Ambitious MT Dems should probably hold out for the chance of an MT-02 to run in come 2022.  The redistricting commission constitutional amendment would basically ensure an all western MT seat would be created.

I still think Quist narrowly wins by single digits if Democrats get more involved in May. But the way their "analysts" seem to be writing this race off is disconcerting.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #30 on: May 05, 2017, 09:12:59 AM »

Gianforte apparently won't say if he supports the AHCA or not.

Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2017, 10:02:20 AM »

Gianforte apparently won't say if he supports the AHCA or not.



I'm not sure if this statement will help or hurt him

If the Quist campaign highlights Gianforte's flip-flop on it and emphasizes Quist's support for universal healthcare that might boost his numbers.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #32 on: May 10, 2017, 05:59:06 PM »

Conventional wisdom has Pianoforte winning. My gut says Quist.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #33 on: May 17, 2017, 11:00:27 AM »

The specials held in the shadow of stupid watergate will be disasters for the republicans!

I feel like this shift has more to do with AHCA than Russiagate, but regardless, seems like Quist is definitely gaining.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #34 on: May 19, 2017, 07:46:12 AM »


Only makes my opinion of him go higher
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #35 on: May 21, 2017, 08:29:18 PM »

The NRA rated Bullock and Tester badly too, and they still won.

Bullock has a C and Tester has an A-. Quist has a freaking F. Gianforte has an A. Could be a large game changer. Also, you have to look at the weed and nude resort issue from Montana's view, and not ours. Hopefully you are right about it, Since I really want Quist to win, but Montana is a socially conservative state, and those two things could be potential game changers.

I'm pretty sure social conservatism isn't going to make a difference in the wake of AHCA and Russiagate.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #36 on: May 22, 2017, 10:52:19 PM »

Bahahahaha. What a legitimately pathetic pollster. I have no doubt they pulled the numbers out of their ass at the last minute.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #37 on: May 22, 2017, 11:01:58 PM »

On a bigger note, why didn't any respectable pollsters get a read on this race? All we got was Gravis and a bunch of Google surveys.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #38 on: May 22, 2017, 11:50:24 PM »

LMAOOOO

Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #39 on: May 23, 2017, 10:15:09 AM »

The story probably lies somewhere in the middle. I still see Quist having a very small advantage over Gianforte in this race, but it's going to be close.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #40 on: May 24, 2017, 06:43:35 PM »

Quist's shares on PredictIt boosted up 17 cents after this news broke. I'm pretty confident this'll have a negligible effect on election-day voters.

Regardless, Gianforte is a piece of s--t and I really hope he doesn't win tomorrow for several reasons, especially this.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #41 on: May 24, 2017, 06:48:01 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

HOLY CRAP
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #42 on: May 24, 2017, 06:49:14 PM »

Apparently Jacobs is in critical condition and he can't breathe.

OMG, fck Gianforte.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #43 on: May 24, 2017, 06:53:24 PM »

This might be a silly question, but why are there national reporters IN montana to cover this, and why is a girlfriend of said reporter even there?

Does jacobs live in montana?

Probably because of the big statewide special election tomorrow?
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #44 on: May 24, 2017, 06:56:33 PM »

Apparently Jacobs is in critical condition and he can't breathe.

OMG, fck Gianforte.

If that is true, how did the reporter tweet about it?

Must've been over the scanner.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #45 on: May 24, 2017, 06:58:13 PM »

Saw Chris Hayes tweet about this, so expect it to get picked up by national news.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #46 on: May 24, 2017, 07:02:08 PM »


Looking at that video I'm guessing he literally just found about it from the reporter. Good for him taking the high road, I guess.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #47 on: May 24, 2017, 07:05:53 PM »

With the details regarding Jacobs condition and Gianforte being arrested, I retract my previous statement and my endorsement of Gianforte. This is a despicable, sinful, and unignorable incident. I endorse Libertarian Candidate Mark Wicks for this election.
You are reading fake tweets, bro. Jacobs is not in critical condition and there is no arrest warrant.

There are literally witnesses and photos.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #48 on: May 24, 2017, 07:08:16 PM »

Jacobs himself says there was a local TV crew at the scene, and The Guardian has audio of the incident.

Gianforte is done.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


« Reply #49 on: May 24, 2017, 07:11:44 PM »

even if this is going to be a major story, it's too late.

It's going to be on the radio when voters drive to the polls tomorrow.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 8 queries.